57
Jeju Air crash: all but two presumed dead in South Korea’s worst domestic civil aviation disaster
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2024
57 points (98.3% liked)
News
35749 readers
3822 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Absolutely horrendous accident! Looks terrifying on the video!
I don't know what happened here, but man does that official speculation make no sense at all. At least I can't think of any realistic scenario in which a bird strike causes that.
Large planes like that use thrust reversers to stop.
A bird striking the engine will kill that engine.
A dead engine means the plane is harder to control at low airspeed and will start to turn towards the damaged engine.
Once they’re on the ground, pilots will use the thrust reversers to redirect the engine thrust forward and slow the plane down, but thrust reversing with a damaged engine will cause the plane to turn very sharply.
And remember, this can all occur in seconds. It’s easy to judge when you’re sitting in your home, but think about the last time you had a near accident while driving. How close were you to disaster? Are you sure you’d be able to make the right call if a deer jumped in front of your car?
I'm a 737 pilot. Reverse thrust is never calculated into landing distance. You use brakes and spoilers, reversers are a bonus. Airplanes are perfectly capable of landing with no thrust, in fact normally in an engine failure you don't use the working reverser because of the potential of a loss of control from asymmetric reverse thrust.
Assuming worst case scenario, they lost hydraulic systems A and B due to an uncontained engine failure. In that case the landing gear can be lowered with a gravity release and the flaps can be lowered with an electric alternate motor. The right engine clearly is still working on touchdown, you can see the cowl shroud open as the reversers deploy in the video. The problem is that they touched down just short of the end of the runway, probably around 180 knots, with a totally clean plane. I don't know how they got into that position, but it wasn't only a bird strike.
Seems like everyone would have made it if there was more room to let the plane run out its speed, an EMAS, RESA, etc.
Boeing..... Okay call the professional assassin, figure out the cover story for when they find out about the break upgrade issue.