73

The movement that helped end Roe is embracing a political strategy that wraps the demonization of trans people in the innocuous-sounding catchphrase “parental rights.”

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] who8mydamnoreos@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago

9 times out of 10 if a child is being abused it is by their parents. Think about that every time these people talk about their right to own their kids. I will vote for the first person who suggests a list of rights for children from their parents. I say this as a parent of two.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

A bill of rights for kids is desperately needed in the US.

[-] rynzcycle@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

So much this. Think of it in terms of child custody in family court, parents have and deserve NO rights, the only thing that matters is the best interests of the children. If that's with mom and/or dad great, if not, so be it. Earn the privilege of your kids, or they will grow up and tell you to F off.

(P.s. you sound like a great parent, thank you for making the world a better place).

[-] who8mydamnoreos@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

All the time I remind my fellow parents, and myself, that we are guides and not wardens. We show the path, we walk the path, and hope they follow.

[-] Poppa_Mo@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Separation of church and state. Keep the religious twist out of the bullshit or start taxing churches.

These morons aren't even following their own rules anymore.

Ragebait and misinformation extreme.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

These morons aren’t even following their own rules anymore.

They never did. JC called them a brood of vipers and told them their father is the father of lies.

[-] iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago
[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago
[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

I got through one paragraph, and then my brain started leaking out of my nose. Would it be wrong to lure these people onto a bus and then drive them elsewhere and leave them with nothing?

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

I hate to admit it sometimes, but yes. They need serious mh treatment.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

When the subject is LGBTQ people existing, they say "why do you have to shove your lifestyle in our faces."

When the subject is Christians trying to enact laws based on their religion, it's "the law should reflect what we believe despite the fact that other people have different religious beliefs. Why shouldn't we shove our lifestyle in their faces?"

this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
73 points (91.0% liked)

politics

18933 readers
3252 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS