Further proof he doesn't even know what the word means
I'd be surprised if he could spell his own name at this point.
The EU is capable of resisting Trump pretty well. However many countries are not. That is honesty the real problem here.
Short term, the countries that can’t say no, will say yes. However, they will seek alternative markets for purchase and sale. It damages the relationship for short term gain, all paid by the business and American consumer.
Fuck Trump and the horse he rode in on (Musk), but he is doing wonders for UK/EU relations.
Lol, he's part of the cabal that pushed for Brexit. One step forward in reaction to two steps back is not to his credit.
Obviously nothing is to their credit. But the talk about tariffs is forcing the UK to look towards Europe more than they maybe would have, and a majority of Brexit voters are now in favour of joining the EU's internal market.
It was just a tongue in cheek way of saying that the US' only ally in the world is going to be the soaring Russian economy - even the Brits, who forcefully tied themself to the Mayflower mast, are now looking back to Europe.
In good personal news, a good friend of mine in the UK has landed a really good job in the UK working on the tariffs. I'm very happy for her. Silver linings. :)
and long term the higher oil and gas consumption is going to damage the climate even worse...
Wat
Trump solicited a billion dollar bribe from the oil industry, so now he needs to put money in their pocket.
This is the most Putin sounding shit I ever read
American does generic American thing: "this is just like the foreign bad guys in my TV show!"
It's just a bad move and stupid threat. I don't want Russian oil and gas...
von der Leyen's sycophancy is the most worrying part of the article, even as individual EU countries, German minister quote, suggests resistance.
EU already signed significant O&G long term contracts after Ukraine war. Even as they are reducing NG and coal electricity by 10% this year, and on path for another 10% every next year, longer term supply lock ins is certain to slow that progress in addition to promoting more global/US development.
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.