851
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Remember when NFTs sold for millions of dollars? 95% of the digital collectibles are now probably worthless.::NFTs had a huge bull run two years ago, with billions of dollars per month in trading volume, but now most have crashed to zero, a study found.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

All my apes, gone

This is even funnier in retrospect

[-] Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Mostly used for money laundering

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 9 points 1 year ago

I'd say there's a fair number of people just speculating.

And a couple people get lucky and make it big. And that's promoted. Cuz it looks great.

But like a lot of the big movements, are money laundering as you said, or a way to bribe people. This politicians wife's cousins son sold an NFT for 4 million that's amazing!

But we get this with traditional art too. Any market where there isn't commodity pricing, price discovery is flexible, so it can be used for lots of social reasons

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Heavybell@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I still think NFTs could be used to make a form of DRM that is actually fair to the consumer, by maki g it so you can resell your digital goods and also make it so your digital rights don't vanish as soon as the seller gets bored. But nobody in a position to make that happen wants that.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago

DRM =/= fair to the consumer.

DRM as a concept seeks to limit your digital rights. Any DRM of any kind is a form of punishment to the consumer. You bought it, it should be yours to do with in perpetuity as you please.

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] Phrodo_00@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

NFTs or blockchains are not needed for this. You could just implement selling or transfers in the content platform.

I do think using contacts for escrow and having the sale being independent from the vendor are cool features, bit not at all essential ones.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[-] TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Now? Probably?

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 11 points 1 year ago

Remember? Fuck no.

It was what for like 5 minutes during a year with a million other more important things going on to pay attention to that thing that kids with only somewhat rich parents used to try and scam their way to being as rich as the kids with really rich parents.

[-] TomMasz@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Anyone with the ability to read who bought one deserves what happened to them. The sellers are probably still laughing.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago

99 times out of 100, it was the seller selling it to himself to artificially inflate transaction numbers and nudge the price up.

[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but that's the thing with scams. They make thousands of attempts, but they only need that one sucker.

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 10 points 1 year ago

You wouldn't right click a car would you.......

[-] root_beer@midwest.social 10 points 1 year ago

Tell me you don’t know anything about the blockchain without telling me you don’t know anything about the blockchain

…is what Techbro Legion (for they are Many) would say if they didn’t have to put all their stuff in hock to recoup their losses

[-] ericisshort@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Turns out it was "not knowing anything" all the way down.

[-] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago
[-] kureta@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

It's a free market. Anyone can come up and say that they are willing to pay millions for an indifferent_insect_boat_club.jpeg at any moment.

[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

pushes glasses up I believe what you meant to say is that its a buyer's market. /s

[-] ipha@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

It was just another form of money laundering though 'art'.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MrPloppy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

A load of rich stupid people got fucked over. Beautiful.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] notannpc@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Oh no….anyway.

[-] boatsnhos931@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

GOT EM! They were all confused and excited that it might be the next Bitcoin..All I need is one good con like this and I can get off this fucking hamster wheel!!

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago

Clever assholes convinced fools that they had "the next big thing". The "smarter fools" realized the problem and offloaded their losses onto greater fools, a considerable portion of which are now wondering how to catch an even greater fool than themselves.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
851 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

59562 readers
2266 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS