it's that simple : memes

[+] Awesomo85@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

[deleted]

[-] Jarix@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

And mutually beneficially so does UBI et al

[-] bruhsoulz@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago

this mf spittin!

[+] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

[deleted]

[-] Lila_Uraraka@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 5 days ago

Pro-lifers do not care a single bit

[+] Turd_Ferg@sh.itjust.works -22 points 5 days ago

[removed by mod]

[-] AWittyUsername@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

That's easy for the neckbeard incel that's never even finished a sentence in a woman's presence without sweating to say.

[-] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 days ago

But nature says fuck! So we fuck!

[-] mukt@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Nature also says have kids, or go extinct.

load more comments (4 replies)

[+] chris@lem.cochrun.xyz -17 points 6 days ago

Doesn't not having sex do that a little better tho? Like i totally get the point, but also, having sex gives chance of baby right? So, don't do it unless you ready? Maybe I'm wrong.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

There are only two reasons any post-pubescent human isn't having sex:

They can't find anyone to fuck them.
They're legitimately asexual. (A rare thing. And no lemmy, just because you're not getting laid doesn't make you "asexual".)

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I've been told by multiple people that if men do not have sex they become fascists.

So, no, not having sex is apparently not an option.

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Isn't the pill stated to be like 99% effective? Why discourage people from using it that want to plan their futures?

[-] TheBrideWoreCrimson@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 days ago

Your suggestion has at least two severe issues:

It doesn't scale. The people that can and want to "wait until they're ready" probably are doing that already. Meanwhile, the large, unwashed majority does whatever they feel like, and why would they want that to change?
It takes away personal liberty and punishes people who "cannot control themselves," giving way to social authoritarianism. To me, that's the exact opposite of what any elected government should do: to make people's lives better.

load more comments (14 replies)

[-] lemmus@szmer.info -3 points 6 days ago

Not so funny.

[+] Allero@lemmy.today -16 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

One issue (and hear me out, I do support abortions, birth control and bodily autonomy!) is that, once given a choice when and how to reproduce, people don't do it as much.

Having pleasure of sex without consequences is screwing the natural incentives for reproduction.

Whether we like it or not, there should be something to support fertility if we don't want to end up in a population crisis, with a few young folks supporting the ever growing army of the elderly.

Now, this should NOT be laws prohibiting abortions, or banning any sort of contraception, but there should be some incentives for people to go, and, well, make babies. This part Republicans got right (wow), they screwed with the suggested methods.

Fixing the financial clusterfuck and letting people live in a bright and predictable world where they know their tomorrow will be good is certainly one way, but I'm afraid it's not enough. What could be the other options? I'm interested in people's opinions.

load more comments (5 replies)

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 days ago

You still are a wage slave paying rent to a landed lord.

[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 3 points 6 days ago

Better than committing another soul to the same fate.

[-] steel_nomad@lemmy.world -5 points 6 days ago

Well, specifically women, but yes that sign is not wrong.

load more comments (7 replies)

Memes

Rules: