342

Iran says it has right to defend itself after Israeli strike kills soldiers (www.bbc.com)

submitted 5 days ago by solo@slrpnk.net to c/world@lemmy.world

240 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 137 points 5 days ago

Iran is correct.

Israel is destabilizing the region further with this shit.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 62 points 5 days ago

We hear about Israel’s right to protect itself so often we almost forget that everyone has it.

[-] Resonosity@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

Everyone, except Palestine and Lebanon

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

I mean right doesn't equate to ability...

[-] 4lan@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

Can we just let the leaders duke it out? 1 on 1 knife fights. Leave the people out of this shit

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

If only.

[T]he ministers and generals of the two countries, dressed in bathing-drawers and armed with clubs, can have it out among themselves. Whoever survives, his country wins. That would be much simpler and more just than this arrangement, where the wrong people do the fighting.

All Quiet on the Western Front, written by a WW1 veteran

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

Eye for an eye for an eye for an eye for an eye...

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (185 replies)

[-] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 29 points 4 days ago

Can't disagree, every nation has the right to defend itself.

[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 9 points 3 days ago

So...what really happened? Israel says it did a "crippling" attack on all of Iran's air defenses and ability to make drones and missiles. Iran says it intercepted most of the attack, limiting the extent of the damage, though with some fatalities (as definitively noted in the article). I've heard conflicting accounts of whether Israel fired from outside Iranian airspace or whether they were doing laps around Tehran. I've seen multiple videos of Iran's air defense in action, but these can be cherry-picked.

Obviously there is going to be an enormous amount of censorship, propaganda, and straight up misinformation. Good luck getting actual good info.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 27 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

To repeat immortal words of the sage ~~Pierce~~ Piers Morgan, "what should the Iranian government do?".

load more comments (13 replies)

[-] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

No lies detected.

Godspeed.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I wonder how long these two will keep attacking each other in the name of their right to defend themselves. They should attack at the same time so both can say it was retaliation for the another's simultaneous attack, it's a perfect plan, both can say they got the last word and stop. Waiting for my Nobel peace prize.

[-] Sundial@lemm.ee 25 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It's unlikely they'll attack before the election, if they do. They know every escalation is another vote for Trump, and even Iran doesnt want Trump in power. My guess is they're going to see who wins and what comes out of it before making any decisions.

load more comments (10 replies)

load more comments

this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024

342 points (97.0% liked)

World News

38948 readers

1474 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.