358
submitted 12 hours ago by PortoPeople@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 44 points 3 hours ago

They probably showed up expecting a "weak" and "stupid"/"low IQ" Harris fumbling over mindlessly reading the teleprompter to a handful of mentally unwell AI-generated rabid leftists and drag queens and instead got their ass handed to them

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 26 points 3 hours ago

I know there was some dingdong on here last week sure her campaign was going to blow up this week and her numbers were going to tank. I'm giving it another week or two before responding again just to drive home how big of a dingdong they really are.

[-] Juice@midwest.social 19 points 2 hours ago

Normalize tactical use of "dingdong"

[-] MehBlah@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago

I support this as long as we bring back dagnabbit as well.

[-] Juice@midwest.social 6 points 1 hour ago

We all have our part to play in making the world an amusing place, dagnabbit

[-] SacredHeartAttack@lemmy.world 468 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

"Oh, I think you guys are at the wrong rally. You meant to go to the smaller one down the street."

Expert level burn.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 9 minutes ago

Coulda added, “don’t worry, you probably haven’t missed the dance number, they go on for a while.”

[-] x00z@lemmy.world 138 points 9 hours ago

Thanks for the anti-clickbait.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Not clickbait, when MAGA supporters get hit with reality this hard they literally disperse into a puff of smoke

[-] x00z@lemmy.world 27 points 3 hours ago

I mean the "one liner" could at least have been put in the OP.

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 117 points 11 hours ago

I AM SO FUCKING HERE FOR THE SASSY MOM COMEBACKS IN THE WHITEHOUSE

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 48 points 9 hours ago

That’s actually pretty good. She didn’t even need to say how great her rally was or how it was the best rally or how no one does a masterlock confefe like she does

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 19 points 5 hours ago

She also didn't say they need to get knocked out.

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 146 points 12 hours ago

I don't really get going to political rallies at all, but what kind of losers with nothing better to do go to a political rally of your opponent.

[-] SGforce@lemmy.ca 139 points 12 hours ago

It's an attempt to intimidate or even start a fight. You know, like brownshirts.

[-] mhague@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Silver shirts to red caps.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 hours ago

I would have loved to see them fucking try. This isn't 1939

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

Ehhh, I don't know about that assessment

[-] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 2 hours ago

I can confirm it is 2024.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
358 points (96.4% liked)

politics

19043 readers
3810 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS