They probably showed up expecting a "weak" and "stupid"/"low IQ" Harris fumbling over mindlessly reading the teleprompter to a handful of mentally unwell AI-generated rabid leftists and drag queens and instead got their ass handed to them
I know there was some dingdong on here last week sure her campaign was going to blow up this week and her numbers were going to tank. I'm giving it another week or two before responding again just to drive home how big of a dingdong they really are.
Normalize tactical use of "dingdong"
I support this as long as we bring back dagnabbit as well.
We all have our part to play in making the world an amusing place, dagnabbit
"Oh, I think you guys are at the wrong rally. You meant to go to the smaller one down the street."
Expert level burn.
Coulda added, “don’t worry, you probably haven’t missed the dance number, they go on for a while.”
Thanks for the anti-clickbait.
Not clickbait, when MAGA supporters get hit with reality this hard they literally disperse into a puff of smoke
I mean the "one liner" could at least have been put in the OP.
I AM SO FUCKING HERE FOR THE SASSY MOM COMEBACKS IN THE WHITEHOUSE
That’s actually pretty good. She didn’t even need to say how great her rally was or how it was the best rally or how no one does a masterlock confefe like she does
She also didn't say they need to get knocked out.
I don't really get going to political rallies at all, but what kind of losers with nothing better to do go to a political rally of your opponent.
It's an attempt to intimidate or even start a fight. You know, like brownshirts.
Silver shirts to red caps.
I would have loved to see them fucking try. This isn't 1939
Ehhh, I don't know about that assessment
I can confirm it is 2024.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News