64

“Despite claims that it was a casual affair or flirtation, Page Six has learned that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and New York Magazine scribe Olivia Nuzzi had ‘incredible’ FaceTime sex.” … “They had ‘incredible’ sex over FaceTime, according to another source, with Nuzzi noting to pals that the 70-year-old had impressive sexual stamina.”

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 40 points 15 hours ago

I refuse to read this article. The headline alone tells me far more than I ever wanted to know about RFK Jr’s sex life.

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 6 points 14 hours ago

That was my reaction…like why do we know this? We should not know this.

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 98 points 19 hours ago

You didn't have to post that

[-] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 37 points 18 hours ago

You have my deepest apologies for inflicting this upon you.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 16 points 14 hours ago

Hats off to Olivia, she's figured out how to gold dig without having to take seventy year old cock, that's just a smart lady.

[-] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 34 points 17 hours ago

Welp, that’s enough news for me today.

[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 33 points 18 hours ago

Nuzzi noting to pals that the 70-year-old had impressive sexual stamina

For a 70-year-old? Or is she saying that he masturbates on camera like a man in his 30's? I guess congrats to webcam grandpa for being so tech savy.

Also to fuel the nightmare, I can't stop picturing the video of Trump barely understanding how to do his speaker phone interview with Musk on his iPhone, let alone a webcam masturbation session with a woman 1/2 his age.

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

I'm sure Emperor Don has a man servant who acts as his technology fluffer.

[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 6 points 10 hours ago

Have you seen the video of when they left Don to his own devices (pun intended), and he was trying to pay for a burger at some bar with bitcoin? The two guys running the place basically take his phone from his hands and one does the transaction for him while the other guy keeps checking their system to see if it worked. It was an amazing "grandpa gets a smartphone" piece of video.

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I haven't, but I'm gonna go look it up right now 😂

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 21 points 18 hours ago

Brainworms and Hepatitis C, dude.

[-] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 15 points 17 hours ago

Can’t catch STIs via FaceTime, minor victory?

[-] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 16 points 17 hours ago

I feel like sexual stamina and masturbation stamina are not the same thing

[-] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 21 points 19 hours ago

I apologize up front for sharing this mental image, it was shared with me and I fear that the only way for me to cope is to pass it on like some bizarre chain letter.

[-] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 10 points 18 hours ago

You are forgiven and hilarious.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 7 points 17 hours ago

It's like the Smile demon, only worse because it doesn't kill you. You live on with the mental image of a 70 year old guy vigorously smashing his junk in front of his phone.

[-] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago
[-] borf@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 18 hours ago

wat dot gif

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

The news source of this post could not be identified. Please check the source yourself. Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
64 points (86.4% liked)

politics

18930 readers
3134 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS