-67
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

When u know who posted before clicking.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 11 points 1 month ago

Everyone constantly down votes you but I appreciate being informed that Jill Stein sucks. 🤷🏻‍♂️

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Jill Stein doesn’t put in the efforts between presidential elections to promote her party or to get her candidates elected in local, state or federal elections.

She’s not for helping anyone besides herself and a majority of Muslim Americans realize this.

[-] blazera@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

You just get that impression because the media isnt interested in her between elections. She continues having events and talks and doing political work.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

How many people in her party are elected in local, state or federal governments?

[-] blazera@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

You really cant be crusading against a party being elected and then try and complain that theyre not getting elected.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Jill Stein doesn’t put in the efforts between presidential elections to promote her party or to get her candidates elected in local, state or federal elections. She’s not for helping anyone besides herself and a majority of Muslim Americans realize this

This was my original comment, the one you responded to.

[-] blazera@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

Yes, effort is put in. Effort that you and the DNC are fighting against on a daily basis. How much effort gets someone elected for the green party? Can you give me a number of speeches given, emails sent, flyers put up, that guarantees their candidate gets elected?

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

How many people in her party are elected in local, state or federal governments?

This question has an answer.

What is the number?

[-] blazera@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

Nah we're talking about putting in effort. They can put in all the work in the world but they cant force anyone to vote for them.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Jill Stein doesn’t put in the efforts between presidential elections to promote her party or to get her candidates elected in local, state or federal elections. She’s not for helping anyone besides herself and a majority of Muslim Americans realize this.

This is the comment you replied to, because it seems like you’re a little confused.

You can’t build a party from the top up, you have start at the bottom, the foundation.

She hasn’t done that and she didn’t even run for president in 2020.

[-] blazera@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

She does do that, you're just ignorant of the work they do. You're starting with some weird conclusion that putting in effort guarantees elections. The effort is put in but you and much larger parties with much larger budgets and legal teams are fighting against that effort.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Ok, so how many people in her party are elected in local, state or federal governments?

[-] blazera@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

You’re starting with some weird conclusion that putting in effort guarantees elections

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Without votes how are you a viable party?

[-] blazera@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

Thats a great reason to vote for them

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Down ballot maybe.

[-] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 5 points 1 month ago

I'll allow this article to slide because the title says it all. See you tomorrow SB.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

1.34% of the American population, the third largest religion in the US behind Christianity and Judaism.

I'm also going to point out that voting based on what's happening to people who share your religion in a foreign country is a TERRIBLE idea. If you make that your voting priority, it will bite you in the face in other aspects of your life because someone will exploit you for their own ends. The same is pretty much true for any single issue voter.

We're all free to be stupid, but it probably won't end well.

So I've been thinking, if I was in these folks shoes, what should I be doing?

I think the Uncommitted movement nailed it on the head: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/sep/19/harris-uncommitted-movement-declines-endorse

tldr - the stupid FPTP system in the US means we effectively are stuck between two candidates, GOP and Dem, and of the two, the GOP one would be much much worse. So without endorsing they still recommend voting for the Dem candidate for President - while also voting down the ballot for candidates who better represent their views (and might be able to make the future President listen or at least rein the President in - e.g. enough Dem House Reps might be able to table a future bill to increase arms sales to Israel).

[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

The most useful thing individuals can do to change or enact specific policy is to get involved in party politics, because the party platforms are decided internally and either becoming a party delegate, or working to garner votes from delegates for particular policies actually works.

I feel like this is a part of what I said in the other comment on this post, about needing to build up from the grassroots. Agreed.

[-] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

The Muslim population in swings states is larger than the margin Biden won in 2020.

[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

The Muslim population isn't a single voting bloc, and a good chunk are still voting Democrat.

On the flip side, the Jewish population is almost twice the size of the Muslim population, so pissing them off is probably worse.

It is indeed a very tough balancing act that needs to be done here.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] blazera@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

How about based on whats happening to people that dont share my religion? Because what is happening is so horrific it doesnt matter what group they belong to, it must be stopped.

[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

When was the last time you posted about the other genocides going on? Do you even know which ones I'm talking about?

Or are you just following the social context around the Israel-Palestine conflict and ignoring the fact that there are multiple other major genocides occurring right now? One of them has had a few hundred thousand kids forcibly separated from their parents and sent to special boarding schools, the other is at almost a half million deaths, both dwarfing the scale of the Israeli-Palestine conflict by almost an order of magnitude.

How about them? Where's the university protests? Where's the demands for divestment? You haven't even made a single comment or post about any of them from what I can see.

Nah, this one is the fad genocide to be all upset about right now.

[-] blazera@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

Ill bite, wikipedia has no idea what youre talking about either

[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[-] blazera@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

Its got 2 other ongoing genocides, neither of which with deaths anywhere near what youre talking about. One for Ukraine which Ive definitely commented on and condemned. And a different one also affecting muslims.

[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

You must not have scrolled down far enough, there's one that's been going on for 20+ years in Sudan. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudanese_civil_war_(2023%E2%80%93present)

The forcibly separated kids one isn't even listed there, because China has done everything it can to scrub it from public knowledge, it's linked to an older one in there though. The Uyghurs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Uyghurs_in_China

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

Reuters - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Reuters:

MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Very High - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.reuters.com/world/us/muslim-americans-moving-jill-stein-potential-blow-kamala-harris-2024-09-19/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
-67 points (10.6% liked)

politics

19096 readers
1159 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS