this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
66 points (85.9% liked)

politics

19089 readers
963 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because the Teamsters, like many blue collar workers, are racist and sexist Trump supporters. It really doesn't need to go farther than that.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/jan/31/teamsters-racial-discrimination-lawsuit

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/teamsters-hurled-sexist-anti-muslim-154544490.html

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Some? Yes. Far too many? Absolutely. All? Not even close. Most current Teamsters were still in grade school and kindergarten when Reagan broke the unions. As a group they've been through 40 plus years of mergers, consolidation, and closures. And are now facing down what looks like an inevitable Extinction in the face of automation. Yes the Republicans engineered it. Democrats of last 40 years helping every step of the way.

It's still mental for them to be supporting republicans. But no one is offering them any salvation at all. Ultimately what's more natural in the face of creeping capitalist Extinction then nihilism?

[–] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

Then fuck you, morons. Trump and conservatives are hostile towards unions and collective bargaining so the only choice is Kamala.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For those unaware of the numbers, the union’s internal vote had members breaking for Trump nearly 2:1. So I guess I hope they have fun when the leopard comes around for some face jerky.

Tangentially, I think Rush Limbaugh and other conservative radio commentators that flooded the airwaves for DECADES across the country are largely to blame. That was one of the “you can always find it anywhere in the US” sections of radio content for a very, very long time, and it corrupted the thinking of a LOT of people. Propaganda works, and it’s often very fucking scary when it does.

[–] VerdantSporeSeasoning@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

In Malala Yousafzai's book, she credits the Taliban first getting into her community by coming through the radio. As an American, I've thought about that a lot over the years.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] morphballganon@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Let's stop using that word as an insult, yeah?

[–] Bananigans@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I'm a member of the labor union and the amount of my union brothers and sisters, who openly support anti union politicians is insane. It drives me nuts, last year at the summer BBQ the local conservative politician showed up and everyone was kissing his ass and taking selfies with him

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Since their internal polling had most favoring drumpf, I guess this is a win for their leadership. They saw those polls and were like "yeah, but no."

Mother Jones - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Mother Jones:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.motherjones.com/politics/2024/09/in-win-for-trump-teamsters-endorse-no-one/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support