1

Oregon's Senate has repealed a 72-year prohibition against self-service gas, with new legislation requiring gas stations to staff half the available pumps, while allowing the rest to be self-service. The bill, responding to industry staffing shortages, also prohibits charging more for full-service than self-service, likely leading to the phasing out of full-service pumps.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] darknavi@vlemmy.net 1 points 1 year ago

Smell that? That's the smell of FREEDOM.

And the smell of gas because I've never learned how to pump and it's all over the ground please send help.

[-] nailbar@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Meanwhile, I live in a country where probably over half the gas stations have no personnel at all.

I remember one service station testing the concept of having staff help with gas, and it felt really awkward.

[-] bermuda@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I live in Washington. I remember one time crossing the border from Portland, Oregon to Vancouver, Washington. What's funny is that Portland has two rivers. The Willamette to the South and the Columbia to the North. The Columbia is the border with Washington. During that trip I stopped for gas, and figured that since I just crossed a river I must be in Vancouver. I got out and started pumping gas only for a guy in an orange vest to come screaming at me to stop like I was about to blow the place up, which is weird because as many of you know it's not that hard to pump gas? Turns out I was in the strip of land in Portland that's between the Willamette and the Columbia, and so I was still in Oregon.

Just a little funny anecdote about this whole situation.

[-] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago

If you have not experienced the lines for gas at an Oregon Costco, you've really missed out. End of an era.

[-] AnotherPerson@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

People in Oregon really don't believe me when I say I never waited in line for gas when I lived in other states.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

So... are we celebrating a bunch of people losing their jobs?

[-] half_fiction@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

The article snippet quoted here literally says this was in response to industry staffing shortages...

[-] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago

There is no shortage of workers. There is only a shortage of employers willing to pay.

[-] half_fiction@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

Sure, but that's entirely beside the point here. Nobody is celebrating people being laid off en masse. The law changed because these jobs were apparently not being occupied to begin with,

[-] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago

Then this is a capitulation we shouldn't have made. These companies tried to coerce us into letting them get away with not hiring people, despite us having a law intended to make them hire people, and we have allowed them to get away with it.

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

"Make work" laws are terrible policy.

You're forcing consumers to pay a human who is only there to inconvenience them.

There's a reason we don't have laws protecting buggy-whip makers. People need to find new jobs that provide value to society.

[-] Silviecat44@vlemmy.net 1 points 1 year ago

Its a dumb job

[-] ipha@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Celebrating the removal of an asinine law that forbid people from doing a common task themselves.

[-] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Pointless jobs, yes

this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

World News

21974 readers
71 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS