432
submitted 1 week ago by tsugu@slrpnk.net to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 51 points 6 days ago

Snap should be reason enough that everyone should abandon Ubuntu, especially when Mint is right there. The last thing we need is to make Linux more like Android+Google Play.

load more comments (35 replies)
[-] udon@lemmy.world 63 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Ubuntu's role in the ecosystem is important. They are good at first luring people into using linux. Then the users get pissed off of Ubuntu, because of Snap, ads, or whatever random crap they know from Windows. Finally, they move on to better options, be it Arch, Debian, or Puppy. Ubuntu ensures they don't all stick to the same

[-] Dark_Dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 6 days ago

Don't forget mint, i started linux journey 2 months back and it's going great with few mishaps.

[-] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

Aww mint, you never forget your first, it’s a bit mundane for me now, these days if it hasn’t taken of its desktop and said sudo me harder daddy 3 seconds after It posts I move on to the next young model.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Ubuntu’s role in the ecosystem is important.

I think it used to be. There's still some inertia, but Canonical has used up a lot of goodwill through the years and other distributions have picked up the slack.
Nowadays I wouldn't point a newcomer towards Ubuntu. It's trash. Just use anything else.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mlg@lemmy.world 34 points 6 days ago

Ubuntu: Shoves snaps, netplan, and horrible documentation down your thoat

Literally every other distro: Here's our standardized system, do what you want

[-] OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml 21 points 6 days ago

Linux Mint Debian edition! 💪

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] s4if@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago

Ubuntu is no longer chad as it pushes snaps everywhere. Real chad uses native packaging only. Lol

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 6 days ago

Ubuntu supports a wider range of devices than Debian? Since when? I was under the impression that Debian supported all or nearly all architectures the Linux kernel supports, Ubuntu only a few popular ones?

[-] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 6 days ago

Maybe they meant of the box. You have to add additional repos to get non-free drivers installed on Debian or install them manually.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] stebator@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

They are good distros for beginners. But over time some people switch to Arch-based systems or NixOS. Because of HUGE software list that you can install without much hassle, you don't have to add 3-rd party repositories or PPAs or figure out how to install .tar.gz package in your system or how to compile from source. You just type one command to install something hard to obtain in other distros.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] WeLoveCastingSpellz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

you do you. But ubuntu is the windows of linux from the perspective of telemetry, propertiary software and such. Like if ur gonna switch to linux might aswell "fully" switch

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 20 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

This is a flawed opinion. You can support a realistic approach of using proprietary software for usability's sake without approving of things like ad profiles. (I say that instead of telemetry because benign things like crash reporting or reporting which features you use are technically also "telemetry".)

Listen, I support foss as much as anyone here but there's a reason SSPL didn't get accepted as a foss license, and it's because it's impossible to have a fully 100% foss system. I'm not saying we shouldn't push for or advocate for that, just saying we shouldn't say someone isn't fully embracing Linux just because they need to use a few pieces of proprietary software to get a working system that supports their individual needs.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] cmhe@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I used to use Ubuntu in the past, and it wasn't Unity, Upstart, Bazaar, Mir, Launchpad, Snap, Amazon ads integration etc. that convinced me to look elsewhere, it was that I found out how other, not commercial distributions, integrated and instrumented its user base into their development.

Instead of having to sign a CLAs when contributing and signing your right away to some corporation, you become part of the community. (Update: It seems they have switched from their Copyright assignment, so something not as invasive in 2011, which is good. But they still require you to sign a CLA.)

So always look who is developing the distribution first, are they individuals or is it one company. And don't let yourself be bated into the dependency of one company, because then you will be the victim of enshittyfication eventually.

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Been my experience that ubuntu tries harder to be a windows replacement

[-] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

except that awful default UI

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
432 points (87.5% liked)

linuxmemes

20693 readers
252 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS