45
submitted 1 month ago by git@hexbear.net to c/technology@hexbear.net
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] hypercracker@hexbear.net 34 points 1 month ago

here we don't want to deal with this shit anymore, you do all the free work

[-] git@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago

There’s no work left to do on Mono and this is just handing over stewardship of the old code for legacy purposes.

[-] hypercracker@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago

The .NET framework adds new APIs all the time

[-] brainw0rms@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago

? not really lol

[-] git@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

.NET Framework was retired years ago by Microsoft and is in maintenance mode.

.NET (formerly .NET Core) is actively developed and is where Mono was forked into, hence Mono no longer being required. About the only thing Mono might be used for now is running .NET Framework binaries directly on Linux where you might not want the full .NET Framework under wine for compatibility or whatever reason. For example, running TShock (a Terraria server implementation) on Linux.

[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

and is in maintenance mode

probably still like a million annual cost of labor for Microsoft to upkeep

[-] smpl@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 month ago

Thank you Microsoft! Eternal gratitude for the kind things you do for us in the Free Software community...

I'm not explicitly mentioned in the post, but effectively the maintainer duties for the Mono project now fall on me.

-- Esme Povirk

I am going to have to request that issues and code contributions be refiled at Winehq for those who still care about them. I have enough on my plate just getting things up and running in their new home, along with my other duties at CodeWeavers, and I don't have the bandwidth to sort through that whole backlog.

-- Esme Povirk

libgdiplus does, as it's a Mono (class library) dependency. So do any submodules. But I don't think we can handle separate projects like MonoDevelop, unless they're important for some reason.

-- Esme Povirk

I can't spend any time on it, I'm stretched thin as it is. Winehq could probably provide a space for it, but I can't help with development.

-- Esme Povirk

[-] brainw0rms@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

yea You can feel their complete despair

[-] ValpoYAFF@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago

I hope this means I can use paint.NET on wine, because that one single program is the reason I dual boot.

[-] git@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

Paint.NET 3.5 works fine under Wine. Later versions will require better Direct2D implementation from Wine.

Consider using free software instead: https://lazpaint.github.io/

[-] sexywheat@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago

God damn, I've got a LOT of music software I still keep Windows for. Cubase and Native Instruments mostly, and there's not a chance in hell they'll ever release Linux versions kitty-cri-screm

[-] alexandra_kollontai@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago

Music software is a very valid reason to avoid Linux

[-] Gorb@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Goofy aah C#

Who remembers mono develop? I do

this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
45 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23236 readers
63 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS