367
submitted 10 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

The move would extend her 36-year House career and continue to freeze her would-be California successors in a long-standing holding pattern.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Spacebar@lemmy.world 186 points 10 months ago

As an unabashed liberal and Dem party voter: enough is enough. Let the future get started already.

[-] transmatrix@lemmy.world 59 points 10 months ago

Same from a progressive/democratic socialist.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Hairyblue@kbin.social 124 points 10 months ago

She is too old to run again. Like Biden, Trump, many others passed retirement age. Let go of power and enjoy your retirement.

[-] hydrashok@sh.itjust.works 46 points 10 months ago

Always nice when all my reps are backwards boomer jackasses that don't make any attempt to represent me or my generation. I wish all congresspersons be forced to retire and prevented from reelection when they reach a certain age.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago

Hell, Gen X barely have any representatives. Boomers still run the place.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 18 points 10 months ago

Always nice when all my reps are backwards boomer jackasses

Nancy Peloso is older than a Boomer. She's from the generation before that, the Silent Generation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 30 points 10 months ago

Yeah she's 83 years old and could be worth $170 million. I think a normal person at some point would just want to take it easy a live their life for a bit. IMO it's kind of ghoulish to have all these 70+ year olds still power-tripping just for the sake of it.

Like Strom Thurmond, who left the Senate in 2003 at 100 years old, and then pretty much died immediately afterwards.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

Pretty sure most of these people would die immediately after retiring. Their thirst for power keeps their body working or something. That's the only reasonable explanation of why in the flying fuck an 80 year old multimillionaire would choose to continue working.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] xander255@lemmy.world 103 points 10 months ago

How else would she get all those hot stock tips?

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 62 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

How much is enough for these people? I have always told myself if I won the lottery, I could live comfortably on 10 million no problem for the rest of my days with my wife and kids. What causes these people to just want more and more instead of just chilling out and enjoying what they have already? Why would you want to run again at her age? Go enjoy retirement!

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago

When some old lady is found with a house full of junk from floor to ceiling we call that a mental disorder. When rich folk do the same with money it's just capitalism at work.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago

Narcissism, mainly.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 92 points 10 months ago

Will these stubborn old fucks just retire and disappear into wine country or something? You are creating a world you won't have to deal with the consequences of and the longer you hold onto power the less experience the next generation of leaders can attain and will ultimately weaken your party and has already weakened the country. Go. The. Fuck. Away. You. Old. Cunts.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 92 points 10 months ago

I live in her district. I will attend campaign speeches yelling, “Let younger generations have a turn!”

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] anon232@lemm.ee 86 points 10 months ago

It's time for nationwide term limits. You get to serve your term and do what you'd like, then give the reins over to the next person. Sick of all these fucking old ghouls who cling onto their positions of power like it's a fucking philosophers stone for them.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 64 points 10 months ago

Don’t shoot the messenger guys, I just share the articles

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 62 points 10 months ago

Someone needs to AOC her. They have primaries, right? It shouldn't be a given that she will be the nominee.

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 28 points 10 months ago

She has too much name recognition and not enough unfavorables for this approach to work. She shouldn't run and if she wins she'll be a lucky to be as coherent as McConnell by the end, but I don't think a primary challenge will work against her. Hope I'm wrong.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Iwasondigg@lemmy.one 17 points 10 months ago

Could not agree more, and I'm going to start calling someone getting primary'd from the left as getting AOC'd.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] foggy@lemmy.world 57 points 10 months ago

She did not oppose her ability to trade in the stock market despite enacting laws that helped enrich her estate.

I am a very liberal person. She did a lot of good, but I absolutely would not want to see her keep her position.

That and I'd rather see someone ~36 years old fill the seat than someone whose had it for 36 years.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] littlewonder@lemmy.world 56 points 10 months ago

VOTE IN THE PRIMARIES Such a small amount of people decide who ends up on the ballot. And an overwhelming majority of incumbents get reelected due to primaries.

Please please please vote! Even if you like the person in the lead, consider voting for someone who might not win but will send a message to the party that their policies need to be folded into the party platform, etc.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Voting can’t fix this, it’s systemic. The Democratic Party will not allow challengers source to their flow of money. A mass movement is required to clip their wings.

[-] Gray@lemmy.ca 15 points 10 months ago

What you just said though contradicts itself. At the end of the day voting en masse for reform is "a mass movement". Things won't change when these politicians feel comfortable. Voting against them and being vocal about this as an issue will scare them. Voting absolutely works and all this rhetoric around "voting can't fix this" is exactly how we end up with this bullshit. Boomers learned decades ago how effective voting can be at changing everything and they have consistently turned out and shaped society around their needs as a result. If young people could get this through their heads then shit would actually change. Especially since millennials and gen z now make up the majority of the voting age population in the US.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

People who say “just don’t vote” or advocate abstaining from elections as a method to end the Democrats are entitled and come from a place of privilege.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Conyak@lemmy.tf 54 points 10 months ago

Just retire already. Her seat is in no danger of going to a Republican and I’m tired of seeing these walking corpses making decisions for us.

[-] 3rihskerb@lemm.ee 49 points 10 months ago

They have learned nothing from what happened with RBG. Or they don’t care (probably more likely)

load more comments (24 replies)
[-] Cobrachickenwing@lemmy.ca 34 points 10 months ago

Don't be like Feinstein where people have to question your health and be ignobly forced out. Leave on a high note.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago

🇱 🇪 🇦 🇻 🇪  🇦 🇱 🇷 🇪 🇦 🇩 🇾 

Shoo. Go away. Let younger people run!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ViewSonik@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago

Why do these people want to continue in these leadership roles? It must be power and the attention seeking lifestyle., right? She is way too old. She would never be hired for a critical role outside of government. Move on and set age limits on our Country’s leadership roles.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Touching_Grass@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago
[-] S_204@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

These power hungry assholes need to be removed. Why can't voters just do the appropriate thing here? This isn't a party thing, it's a 'bitch is gonna die on the house floor' thing.

Same for Mitch even though he stole his election and Feinstein. They're all fucking awful.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Plavatos@sh.itjust.works 23 points 10 months ago

It's wild to me that when she lost/left Speaker of the House she said (paraphrasing) that is was time to let the younger generation lead yet here she is again....

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] books@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

Jfc. It's literally impossible for these geriatric people to give up power.

[-] vjxtdibobyd@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

We're really going to have to wait for these people to die in office to get rid of them, aren't we? From both parties

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 17 points 10 months ago

I am so fucking sick of this gerontocracy. All these demented drooling old fucks need to clear out and leave guiding the future to people who still have one.

[-] erranto@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Such a dry sponge

[-] DarkWasp@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

She needs to retire already and they really need age limits for congresspeople. She has been involved in politics since JFK was President, time to move on.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

FFs really? Just move on and start on OF already.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
367 points (95.3% liked)

politics

18080 readers
2854 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS