The future of renewable energy is very promising. It's easy to miss how fast it can turn around when growth it grows so much year-to-year but starts at a small place. Keep this kind of growth up and the grid will be clean a lot faster than seems possible.
Beyond solar I'm also very hopeful about offshore wind efforts in the US.
I think geothermal is the next big thing because oil and gas companies don’t just get to invest in it—they already have the knowledge and tools to make it happen. We could actually see them turn from one fuel to another.
Plus, there are power storage solutions that involve drilling into bedrock.
Considering the level of grift in this country, I'll celebrate once it's all actually built and not a second earlier
What's the total power consumption of the USA? Just want to know how much this makes up.
For those who're more familiar with solar, will there be an issue with solar panel farms taking up land (which may cause environmental issues)? Wonder if there's a balance to be struck there.
Looks like 4200 gigawatts/yr. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/electricity/electricity-in-the-us-generation-capacity-and-sales.php
So not quite 1% even. Progress is progress, I guess.
What is scary is that barely 1% represents a hella lot of coal plants.
Actually, it looks like renewables have overtaken coal, with the majority of fossil fuel energy being provided by natural gas plants. I'm personally fine with newer LNG plants, since they (1) are actually quite clean, and (2) burn a byproduct that we get from making gasoline.
Last i saw the US had just got to the point of having more solar generation than coal, it's a great milestone because in this broken world it means we'll have not solar lobbyists than coal lobbyists
I think you mean Twh not Gwh.. For reference Norway produces about 150 Twh a year
His unit was GW, not GWh. Maybe you are talking about the same if you multiply by 365x24.
I'm honestly not sure. Their mixed use of billions, trillions, kilo, giga, etc was confusing me.
That's 4200 TWh/year, or 480 GW.
Though that ignores the power consumption that isn't electrical yet, like transportation and heating.
Re: land use, see: agrivoltaics - dual, symbiotic use for solar + agriculture. They work very well together.
Great news. Let's double that next year.
European here.
Great! Now double that yearly, over the next 5 years and keep us posted on how much that impacted the economy and everything else.
Good shit. We're getting to this extremely late, but it's at least good progress.
That's almost 26 and a half time machines!
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Sept 7 (Reuters) - The U.S. solar industry expects to add a record 32 gigawatts (GW) of production capacity this year, up 53% on new capacity in 2022 and helped by investment incentives under the Inflation Reduction Act, a report published on Thursday showed.
The report by the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) and Wood Mackenzie estimated total operating solar capacity would grow from 153 GW currently to 375 GW by 2028 as supply chain challenges brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic and restrictive trade policies abate.
Increased investment in domestic manufacturing could see U.S. solar module production grow tenfold by 2026 if all new factory plans materialise, Wood Mackenzie said.
"In the year since its passage, the IRA (Inflation Reduction Act) has undoubtedly caused a wave of optimism across the solar industry," said Michelle Davis, head of global solar at Wood Mackenzie.
The Biden administration's 2022 Inflation Reduction Act allocates about $370 billion toward climate change and clean energy efforts, including incentives aimed at promoting solar and wind power.
The utility-scale and residential solar markets led the way with new capacity additions in the second quarter, mainly as customers in California rushed to install solar before changes to net metering rules took effect, the report said.
The original article contains 288 words, the summary contains 207 words. Saved 28%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
200w capacity in 1 square meter ? rather use windmills instead (especially offshore)
Or just put them in places where people can't live easily, like the desert, which is what's being done. Also, we can do both!
excessive heat makes panel inefficient. they need to be cool to reach maximum efficiency (at 26°c) .. might as well install them offshore..but still, remote place is best place
Good point!
solar actually gets a greater power density. most wind projects in the US get about 2.5 MW/km^2
News from around the world!
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc