167

Now JD Vance Accused of Dissing All ‘Postmenopausal’ Women (www.thedailybeast.com)

submitted 3 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 47 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This man has so many opinions about women and their required roles in society, it’s so strange. With most candidates, we’re talking about a mixture of their issues and their life experiences, but with this guy it’s just all of his weird takes on women.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago

Their target audience are weirdo incels and wife-beating hicks.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago

Is it their target audience or their only remaining audience?

I don’t think they need to capture the incel misogynists, the just are those things.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 months ago

none of this should be surprising after "grab'em by the pussy" lost no support

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 27 points 3 months ago

These weirdos hate women.

[-] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

And their wives too apparently. Why else would you put up with that kind of father figure for your kids?

[-] ChrisG@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

As Trump campaign polling craters, Vance, The gift that keeps on giving 🤣🤣🤣

[-] dudinax@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago

I love how he says it's their whole "theoretical" purpose. As if he's offering a learned position.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Accused of?

[-] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago

Does he even like women??

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 months ago

“It’s a disgrace that the media is lying about JD

Project project project.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago

Daily Beast - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for Daily Beast:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.thedailybeast.com/vance-runs-from-resurfaced-podcast-chat-about-postmenopausal-women

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024

167 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19097 readers

1159 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News