459
submitted 1 year ago by cjf@feddit.uk to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 123 points 1 year ago

not surprising, britain has a history of being rude with those who helped break encryption

One of the darkest stains on my country's history in my opinion

[-] koper@feddit.nl 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What about the centuries of imperialism here and there

[-] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago
  1. World domination and genocide
  2. Alan Turing’s castration and suicide

Worst things the British have done.

[-] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

I did not expect to see a WW2 joke in this thread.

[-] banazir@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it's a clever one too. And dark. Excellent joke.

[-] MarigoldPuppyFlavors@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't it make more sense if Britain had a history of being rude to those who invented encryption rather than those who broke encryption? Like, within the logic of the joke, Turing and Britain would be on the same side.

Seems like someone just wanted to flex their common knowledge by jamming a joke into things.

[-] banazir@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Alan Turing was instrumental in breaking the German Enigma code for the allies.

[-] TheSun@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago

No.... Britain was "rude" to Turing because they convicted him of gross indecency for being homosexual and chemically castrated him.

Right, but they're not being rude to people who break encryption today. They themselves want to break it. So the "history" that OP refers to isn't relevant to the article. If they had a history of being rude to whoever invented encryption then it'd make more sense.

[-] HumanPerson@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

You don’t know the end of that story, do you?

[-] jsdz@lemmy.ml 73 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So they've decided that this part of the bill will be unenforceable and useless, but they plan to go ahead and pass it anyway. I suppose they'll soon need to do the same for the age verification nonsense as well.

They still want to impose these ill-conceived laws on us so as to appear to have done something, but the people who had somehow been convinced that this would do some good will be disappointed. If they stick with this course, they will soon have managed the impressive political feat of pleasing exactly nobody with the results of this excruciating years-long process of counterproductive legislating.

[-] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There are plenty of laws out there that nobody cares about enough to try and enforce, but if you aggrevate the wrong people then suddenly you're found in technical violation of them and they have rational to toy with your life. This would be one of them I expect.

[-] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

The whole premise is dumb like their war on drugs, porn and whatever else offends their Victorian-era sensibilities. You cannot stop encryption, the genie is out of the bottle since the advent of PGP. These Dunning-Kruger morons make me embarrassed to be British.

[-] socsa@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They'll just focus on baking obscure side channel attacks into firmware wherever they can. Consumer devices also leak a ton of EM energy, and there have been a bunch of "proof of concepts" at deriving device state remotely by observing such energy. I'd be pretty surprised if the right folks can't read private keys being loaded into cache under the right circumstances already.

In a way it's kind of a poetic compromise. They can't do mass surveillance like they want, but they can still "tap" devices via physical access, preferably with a healthy dose of due process.

[-] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Agree. If the state is determined to spy on something, no doubt they will find a way but legalising wholesale collection of data is not ethically sound. Governments want a way into every communication channel whenever they feel the need and Facebook, et al have been happy to sell out their users. Encryption provides the necessary and sufficient barrier to prevent this type of whimsical over-reach.

[-] digdilem@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Absolutely agree. It's pandering to a small minority of pressure groups demanding to make the internet safe, without understanding the fundamental nature of what they're trying to do or the implications of doing so.

Absolute shower of cockwombles. We need to vote these arseholes out of danger.

[-] SamSpudd@lemmy.lukeog.com 44 points 1 year ago

Not out of the woods yet, but a good win

[-] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 1 year ago

This is a temporary reprieve rather than a victory. The wording of the bill hasn't changed, they've simply added the statement that what they want to do isn't technically possible yet but when it is, this'll be revived.

[-] elouboub@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

That encryption can have a backdoor for "the good guys" to use but never the bad guys? I guess this is defeated then.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 year ago

Yeah, let's break encrypt!

Not that it's possible but it would be awesome no? That somebody can just read my passwords, access my bank accounts, read my private messages... You trust the government with those keys, Right?

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sure is strange how both the #GOP & #Tories have decided to go cartoon villain after their #Russian money got cut off.

[-] Demigodrick@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 year ago

The tories have been villains since 2010. Plenty of Russian money still floating around there I'm sure.

[-] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 year ago

2010

Much, much longer than that.

[-] Platform27@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

~~Don’t forget about the Labour Party.~~ They played a huge part creating and pushing for this bill.

Edit: Apologies, I forgot that the Labour Party is the Red Tie Tories. Carry on.

[-] Klear@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Weren't they in full cartoon villain mode the whole time? I don't really see what changed.

[-] banazir@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Cartoon? 'Tory' literally means 'robber'.

[-] Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

They'll be back to try again if this bill is not passed.

[-] BaldProphet@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Too bad for all the Russian hackers that were looking forward to a bunch of back-doors to exploit.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago

The law is still getting passed though

[-] hottari@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

This argument doesn't add up. Apple had already built a CSAM scan system before shelving it and am pretty sure Google have one for Drive/Photos.

[-] Sygheil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Why not publish classified documents first and then we can talk about breaking encryption for us blokes. Damn governments.

[-] Agility0971@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Glowies luckily lost this battle

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago
this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
459 points (99.4% liked)

Privacy

31609 readers
341 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS