This doesn't advocate for any substantial improvement of data protections. It's merely a convenience argument to legitimize banning Chinese cars for economic reasons. American car manufacturers will continue to harvest and sell all your data, just with less competition.
Of course, this isn't a surprise coming from the CFR, the lobbying organization for US imperialism.
"Safe" being defined in a user-hostile manier, i.e. with unmodified Google components and not rooted.
"Google-controlled" would be a better word.
Would there be any evidence that could satisfy you, or are you just looking for a reason to dismiss this?
peace
(Subject to availability in your area)
Or the unsafest place, if you're not privileged.
👏More👏Queer👏War👏Criminals👏
Digitizing is only lossy once*. Analog is lossy every time you copy it and degrades over time.
*Assuming you use a lossless digital format
Soon hundreds of churches will claim to have a genuine fragment of his fidget spinner.
In case you don't know, Cloudflare already controls a massive amount of websites, have access to their unencrypted traffic and are making the web inaccessible for people who use tor or noscript. They are a threat to the open web.
For the last time: these language models are just regurgitating what people have said. They don't analyze or reason.
Or you could just stop speeding. If you think that breaking the law and taking the risk of injuring/killing another human being is more important than a little annoyance, you should get your priorities straight. The world doesn't revolve around you.