1101
Dodge this! (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 148 points 3 months ago

If the Olympics gave out gold medals for memes, this would get one.

[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 20 points 3 months ago
[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Gold medal in freestyle trolling

[-] Mojave@lemmy.world 64 points 3 months ago
[-] Lepsea@sh.itjust.works 58 points 3 months ago
[-] Wild_Mastic@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I laughed way too much at this

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 63 points 3 months ago

I eventually found her original performances, and frankly she is shown in memes to be much worse than she actually was.

IMO she failed for two reasons:

  • she thought that instead of repeating the known moves she creates her own, trying to use them to tell some kind of story. Judges did not find appreciation for that
  • I think she was the oldest from all contestants (she is 36 and youngest contestants was 16, so less than half her age), so no way she could make things as dynamic as they did and her moves were slower
[-] BigPotato@lemmy.world 73 points 3 months ago

Saying the words "Break dancing" and "she creates her own moves [as why she failed]", to me, proves there's zero need for that to be an Olympic sport.

I've always kind of detested 'judged' sports, not the sports themselves but the idea of judging creative expression on a scale. Like, "We, the panel, have decreed that your moves were not funky fresh. Pop and lock your way to the locker room please."

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 15 points 3 months ago

I approve of it only as long as they use those words precisely.

[-] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 months ago

That isn't really how the judging worked though. First they had a huge panel of judges - 9 of them. And they judge them on 5 criteria: technique, vocabulary, execution, musicality, and originality. It is qualitative, but it's a comparative rating system with actual guidelines - so they each simply have to decide who did each thing better:

Maintaining physiological control while focusing on athleticism, form and spatial awareness.

The range of moves that display variation and the quantity of moves, ideally with minimal repetition.

The ability to land and perform moves smoothly, without falls or slips and while maintaining consistency and flow.

The ability to stay on beat, syncing movements to the rhythm of the music.

The capacity for improvisation, creativity and maintaining spontaneity with style and personality.

I don't think breaking necessarily needs to be in the olympics, but we're past the point of only allowing sports (looking at you, dressage) and we do have other artistic events (rhythmic gymanstics and synchro swimming). And, the scoring system for breaking was reasonable and able to determine valid winners.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Geometrinen_Gepardi@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 months ago

They could judge the winner by crowd decibel level instead.

[-] plzExplainNdetail@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

While a simple solution for a popularity contest, it has great drawbacks when looking for techique comparison. Someone's family may be bigger or louder than others, some people may have more fans in the audience, who can afford to attend will skew the vote, being an international event would mean that it's likely the home team has the advantage as people from the host country have a greater opportunity to attend, some event crowds may be determined by time of day or by public transportation, and the audience may not see the whole (5 hour breakdancing) event and certainly won't see the performers as well/as close as the judges would. Additionally the audience has so many new viewers during the Olympics that don't know how hard certain moves/sequence of moves are while some easy flashy moves will wow a crowd every single time. None of those things show particularly compelling qualification to determine how technically good the performer/performance is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

I found her performances and to me it was absolutely not the moves that let her down. It was a complete lack of rhythm and flow.

They were bad.

[-] volvoxvsmarla@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago

I have already invested more than I would into finding the performance (i.e. 5 mins), but all I find are videos talking about it. Do you have a link?

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Wow, you are not wrong. It's like it's been fucking scrubbed from the internet. I may actually have to look for a torrent.

[-] AhismaMiasma@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

If you find it, please update this comment chain. I too am looking to see it but too lazy to search for longer than 5 mins.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kaput@lemmy.world 54 points 3 months ago

It seems very hard to find the whole video for the breakdancing

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago

NBC blocked anyone I the states from watching it without Peacock, and now they're taking the replays off Peacock because Fuck you that's why.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 14 points 3 months ago

Yeah it's pretty absurd. What, are you going to sell a boxed set later? Fucking clowns.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 6 points 3 months ago

They took down replays? Fucking insane.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 4 points 3 months ago

VPN anywhere where it's legally required to be public, like the UK.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tgxn@lemmy.tgxn.net 5 points 3 months ago

If you're Australian, is free on 9now.

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago

same in UK. This is why people use Tiktok

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 10 points 3 months ago

A lot taken down due to copyright claims (shouldn't an international competition about peace be free to distribute?) so s lot of people are just recording their TV with their phones.

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

You have to understand the absolutely massive amount of money being shoveled at the Olympics committee by the network that gains the right to show these performances. And the mountains of cash they in turn get in advertising revenue. The Olympics is one of the most capitalist events on the planet.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[-] Jeanschyso@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago

People often say "we should send one normal person to show how hard what they're doing actually is"

This is what happens when we do

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

Kangaroo Court Execution

[-] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Disclaimer: take this with a grain of salt, it's basically hearsay

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 26 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I don't believe a word of any of this, especially because of the unsourced line "From Reddit."

However, even if you were to lose every speck of skepticism the internet should have trained you to have, I still wouldn't care because that's fucking funny and the Olympics aren't serious business.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] moon@lemmy.ml 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

There's no mention of any of this in an article about how she qualified. In fact, you can go and watch her qualifications on YouTube and it looks like she did 1v1 battles against some mediocre opposition and won each time.

From what I could find, her husband's name is Samuel Free and I can't find his name listed on either the AusBreaking or DanceSport Australia websites.

Maybe some Lemmy sleuths can find something to confirm that something nefarious was going on here, but to me it just looks like the idea that her qualification was rigged is just a Reddit rumour. If anything, it looks more likely that she participated in a closed qualification system that didn't allow for the best competitors to show up

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 7 points 3 months ago

Either way, I'm unsurprised that at least one contestant (especially in a subjective event) seemed like an odd pick the first time the event was held at the Olympics.

[-] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 3 months ago

This would be a great time-capsule meme, with no context or explanation.

[-] Wild_Mastic@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Can anyone explain to me why this guy became a meme? I'm out of the loop

[-] Soggy@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago

Most competitive shooters are using special equipment and he looks comparatively very casual.

[-] PassingDuchy@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Most Olympic athletes are young and wear fashion athletic clothes donated by endorsers who help pay them. In addition in the shooting category you're (as I understand it) allowed a certain amount of tech to help you out. This man is older, didn't wear the endorsed fashion clothes or the tech and won ~~gold~~ silver so he feels like a rare "every man" win in the Olympics. He is not an "every man" (believe he's a decorated military and police man in his country), but a lot more people can relate to him winning ~~gold~~ silver than a 14 year old who's been training for this since diapers in a fashion house outfit.

[-] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago

He won silver in the pairs event.

[-] PassingDuchy@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Oof I feel bad for his partner had no idea he was in pairs from the way he's been talked/meme'd about....

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Someplaceunknown@fedia.io 8 points 3 months ago

Breaking bad

[-] Engywuck@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago

Amazing. Congrats, OP.

[-] crawancon@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago

there is no spoo-spoo-spoo-spoo(sprinkler sounds)n

[-] Intrama@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
1101 points (96.2% liked)

memes

10321 readers
653 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS