this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
114 points (96.0% liked)

politics

19102 readers
4055 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] moistclump@lemmy.world 43 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Ehh this one I’m not a big fan of. Do a more general like “under $35k no tax” but no tax on tips leaves out minimum and low wage workers who just so happen to not make tip income.

Am I missing something here?

[–] Ctrl_Alt_Banana@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago

Agreed, and encourages employers to keep pushing tipping onto everyone. I already thought it was bad, I don't want to have to pay a tip at every store I go to. I'd much rather have a set price and employees make a living wage even if it's a little more expensive

[–] Euphorazine@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The government wants more data. It feels like it's a common unspoken rule that tipped employees don't claim cash tips.

So it seems like "hey, since you lie to us to keep your cash tips and it's optically bad and a waste of IRS resources to even pursue you, just tell us how much you actually made for data collection reasons and we'll ignore it"

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Even if they weren't taxing it there's no way in hell I would tell them about my tips

[–] Aarrodri@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

How about getting rid of Tips and pay your employees?

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Or do both.

Dems want to raise base pay, and the GOP does not, so they keep lobbing things like this over the fence.

By saying tip won’t get taxed, you knee cap their stupid plan and can focus the conversation on raising base pay.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not taxing tips is the government subsidizing businesses that underpay their employees. And makes eliminating tipped wages harder as the tipped take home pay will be that much higher.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah, but you’re going to lose at the ballot box with that.

If Harris is smart she will remove Trump’s no-tip differentiator, and go bigger. Go bigger by saying “Americans are sick of 20% and 25% tip buttons on everything. Pay better wages.”

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Dunno if you're aware but the president can't do that

[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

The president can't unilaterally decide whether tips are taxed or not either.

This article is not discussing an action Harris can or will take. This is discussing policies she supports- she can use political influence to help get it through and past Congress.

This applies to like 95% of all political discourse by the way. People want to blame the president because it's easier to blame one name and face than to try to pick out one of the hundreds in Congress.

[–] Xenny@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Look I get tips and if this went through I would be making a good 3-5 grand more a year.

But I agree with the statements I continue to see echoed. This doesn't make sense and instead we should try to raise the standard deduction so everyone benefits. Taxes are absolutely insane right now and it would be nice to see the balance put a bit more on those that actually have money.

[–] joeynotjoe@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

This is such an unfair policy. Tax ~25% of the income of only people who get tips? I I don't get it.

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You pay taxes on tips? Not only are you not paying Your workers, and expect them to live on customers generosity, but You also tax the money that you don't pay them.

[–] ji17br@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

Tips are more like a gift than income. I'm fine not taxing tips, but also getting rid of sub minimum wage for tipped workers. Pay min, at least and tax that. Tips are extra and shouldn't be taxed.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 months ago

The business isn't paying their workers, but they're not taxing the tips, the government is, like it taxes all wages. Realistically this proposal is just going to encourage more businesses to use tips to pay wages.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Reminder, the republicans don’t want to tax your tips.

The democrats don’t went to tax your tips, and they want to raise the federal minimum wage and tax the rich so schools and roads don’t continue to crumble