14
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] alyaza@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

it's unavoidable to center Elon here but can we just take a step back and appreciate how stupid, bad, and completely antithetical to a usable website this idea is? blocking has been a feature on like everything since phpBB forums because it literally just works. it's an easy way to curate your experience without escalating and it's a logical imitation of being able to simply avoid a person in real life. the idea of removing this in favor of nothing but mutes is just goofy as fuck (and if you make muting the new "block", what's even the difference between them? people will just use them basically the same way!).

[-] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Muting means other people can still comment on your stuff, and everyone else but you can see it.

Its so transphobes and homophobes can continue commenting on LGBT people's content.

[-] dingus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Elon Musk really fucking hates his trans daughter. Dad of the century, right here.

Seriously good on his daughter for dropping his scumbag ass. She deserves far better from a parent.

[-] witchonabike@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

I wasn't aware he had more children than the one with the weird-ass name. The private life section on wikipedia is a ride...

[-] dingus@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He ascribes to Longtermism and like his associate Jeffery Epstein, he thinks his genes are magically special, and so he wants as many offspring as humanly possible: while not actually giving one shit about the quality of life for any of them.

It's really interesting, because he fucking hates his own father (Errol is also a creep who fathered a child with his step-daughter, who he raised from childhood), but can't put together that he is exactly the fuck the same as his creep ass father.

[-] Butterbee@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

So what you're saying is, if I have a Twitter account and I start blocking many MANY people it costs Elon money? Interesting.

[-] NoxiousPluK@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fun fact: a block feature is required to be accepted by the Apple AppStore review process. So Twitter will disappear from Apple devices with this change.

Since this got some votes and became visible, here's the source:

Apps with user-generated content present particular challenges, ranging from intellectual property infringement to anonymous bullying. To prevent abuse, apps with user-generated content or social networking services must include:

- A method for filtering objectionable material from being posted to the app

- A mechanism to report offensive content and timely responses to concerns

- The ability to block abusive users from the service

- Published contact information so users can easily reach you

https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/#user-generated-content

[-] StrayCatFrump@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hmm. Hate to be a downer, but that sounds like there needs to be a way for the service itself to block (ban) users and material, not for users to be able to block other users. So I wouldn't be too optimistic about Apple's response....

[-] savedbythezsh@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Apple's review process is inconsistent at best. I used to work for an iOS app and it took several years before they blocked our release for not having a report feature on products. Never had the ability to block users, despite the ability to DM people.

Plus, for an app the size of Twitter, Apple will likely ignore most rules that doesn't lose them money.

[-] direfield@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Huh why ? This doesn't make sense

[-] MaxAmperage@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

There's been a big effort to block anybody with a blue checkmark since any major story or viral post will have them automatically bumped up to the top of the replies. So, when the whiners started complaining, he started openly considering this.

[-] dimspace@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

He will end up "compromising".

You can block people, but only people without blue check marks.

Wanna harass someone, wanna be a troll, subscribe to Twitter blue and you can't be blocked...

[-] Talmir@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

So he's run out of engineers that know how to maintain the block feature?

[-] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Elongated Muskrat has discovered just how many accounts are blocking him. His ego can’t take that. His FrEeSpEeCh must be heard

[-] mynameisnotdoug@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

My account isn't blocking him.

At least, not since I deleted it. And stopped visiting Twitter.

[-] EliYeet@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[-] DJDarren@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Elon Musk is a gaping, farting anus. I pay as much attention to the sounds from a gaping, farting anus, as I do from him.

[-] bizzwell@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I really hope platforms like Lemmy and Mastodon take off. Just the idea of no single person with control over how we all communicate and share ideas gives me hope for the future.

[-] Helix@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

sadly, Mastodon currently still is pretty centralised around a few very big instances. I hope the Fediverse gets more decentralised…

[-] Lowbird@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think if one of them goes sour it'll be easier for people migrate to another mastodon instance, and for that instance to grow. When Twitter goes bad, there's not just a convenient alternative exactly-Twitter-but-run-by-different-people around the corner. But those small Mastodon instances could grow if they had an influx (to a point, and probably better so if the influx was gradual).

Edit: especially because federation means that the people who move to the new instance can still see and interact with everyone on the old instance, so they can't be held to the old instance merely by the presence of their friends on that instance. Unless the old instance blocks federation with wherever people start moving to, but still.

[-] bizzwell@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

What does it take to facilitate this? Do individuals have the ability to help it along, or does it take more resources? I'm new to this but would like to learn.

[-] Helix@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You just have to (encourage others to) register on an instance with less than, say, 1000 active users. I think that's already taking care of most of the issue.

[-] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Watching major social media websites actively kill themselves has been nothing if not an experience

[-] Leer10@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

The even better experience is seeing people try out federated versions of what they love, re-decentralizing the internet 🥰

[-] Helix@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago
[-] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Wow...

Is there some kind of tech CEO competition running or something?

"Who can alienate their user base the fastest"

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

There's a saying, " never attribute to malice what is easily explained by incompetence".

But we're quickly reaching the point where it's no longer easily explained incompetence. Elon is either the most incompetent person in the known universe, which is saying a lot, or he's doing this on purpose for some reason.

I'm not into conspiracies, but it's starting to make more sense if he's actively trying to tank the stock.

[-] thal3s@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

He just wants everyone to be exposed to his right-wing buddies toxic posts.

[-] Fauxreigner@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

There's no stock to tank. You could argue that he's trying to tank the company, but there are easier ways to do that.

[-] BobKerman3999@feddit.it 0 points 1 year ago

Yes there are, but he's already with the SEC breathing on his neck for other scams so I guess he wants plausible deniability.

[-] Fauxreigner@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

There's no stock or similar security, so the SEC doesn't care at all. Could be a plausible deniability thing, I just think it's more likely that he really is that dumb, given the stories about Tesla/SpaceX having teams that basically existed just to control him.

[-] YellowtoOrange@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Except for his account, I'd bet.

[-] Veraticus@lib.lgbt 0 points 1 year ago

Is advertising revenue so important to them they're willing to sacrifice literally everything else for it?

If it's not easy to use reddit, who will use reddit?

[-] dingus@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If it’s not easy to use reddit, who will use reddit?

The same people who hooted and hollered about Netflix ending password sharing and then went ahead and made their own account anyway because they can't be arsed to read a book or find something else to do to fill their sad little lives.

[-] Transwithvans@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago

Elon trying not to make the worst decisions possible challenge (Impossible)

this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37708 readers
158 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS