this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
144 points (97.4% liked)

Firefox

17951 readers
150 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
k_o_t@lemmy.ml
144
You Can Now Try Firefox’s Vertical Tabs (www.howtogeek.com)
submitted 3 months ago by AnActOfCreation@programming.dev to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
33 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
  • Firefox Nightly 131 introduces vertical tabs and an improved sidebar, enhancing tab management and multitasking for users with many open tabs.
  • The vertical tabs feature, similar to Microsoft Edge, keeps tabs organized on the left-hand side and can be customized via Firefox Labs settings.
  • Additional features include AI chatbot integration in the sidebar and ongoing development of tab grouping and profile management tools.
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Looking forward to this one. I use vertical tabs on Edge at work and it's very useful on wide screens.

Hope they remembered to add a bottom to collapse/expand the tab bar.

Now we only need tab groups and we'll be all set.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I feel like I heard something about tab groups in nightly a while back? I'm using a tab group extension but it's not the same.

I remember using vertical tabs in Opera back in the day and feeling like a king. Can't wait to test this out

[–] festnt@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

yeah i heard about tab groups too, idk how thats going (i dont use nightly, though i really should)

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 months ago

I don't use nightly either. I probably should too 😆

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh, does this replace Tree Style Tabs?

[–] Onihikage@beehaw.org 8 points 3 months ago

Rather than replace, I'd guess it could be an alternative. The best part of it will be the ability to natively disable the top tab bar instead of needing a janky userchrome css hack that doesn't even fully work.

[–] TwinTusks@bitforged.space 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I don't quite see the lure of vertical tabs.

[–] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nowadays most websites leaves half of your horizontal space empty on high resolution monitors, so you have a lot of unused real estate. Verticals tabs can also fit in more tabs while showing tab title and can implement features like collapsible tabs.

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago

Tiling WM though?

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

I do, I have a 2K display with lots of horizontal space. Vertical tabs allow me to better group and see tab names in vertical space rather than trying to line up truncated tab names on a horizontal axis.

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Additional features include AI chatbot integration

That's why I was against the AI integration for the image text-summary in the PDF. I knew Mozilla would not stop there and integrate more AI tools into the browser. As much as I love Firefox, as a user from version 1 days, this AI integration without an option to turn it off is a reason to switch... But I didn't found an alternative yet (I'm well aware of all the browsers).

[–] Bogasse@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I think it can be disabled, in the screenshot from the articles there is a "AI chatbots" toggle

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I used the wrong word. I meant it can't be uninstalled (like an addon). It's just part of the browser. If this was an optional addon for people to uninstall or replace if they want, it would be fine. It's not the first time Mozilla did that, even outside of Firefox too.

[–] HouseWolf@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Pretty sure LibreWolf will ship without the Ai. They normally remove invasive stuff before compiling rather than disabling it in a config later.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago

Until it re-enables itself like so many toggles in Firefox do after updates.

[–] Dymonika@beehaw.org 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How about Mull?

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's on my list. One of my criteria is, it has to be in the official repository for Archlinux. And Mullvad-Browser, like many of the other Firefox based browsers, are not.

[–] Dymonika@beehaw.org 1 points 3 months ago

Weird. I wonder why.

[–] firewood010@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Do we have tab groups yet?

[–] AnActOfCreation@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

Not yet. They're supposedly "working on it". This is the feature I'm most looking forward to.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

So far it's not perfect yet, but I already switched to it. Very nice.

[–] grandma@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is awesome, now if they switch to a JS engine that isn't slow and buggy on my laptop I have 0 reasons to use anything chromium-based anymore

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I would much prefer they not become more chromified than they switching to chrome's JS engine.

[–] grandma@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

I'm not saying they should switch to v8. Ideally they'd make their own performant JS engine but I doubt they actually have the resources for that. I'm just wishing for a browser that's actually good on all fronts even though it realistically cannot exist