77

cross-posted from: https://yall.theatl.social/post/3383427

From the Saporta Report:

It can be hard to sort out what’s news in the middle of a dumpster fire.

The post A red flashing light at the dumpster fire appeared first on SaportaReport.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago

There were a lot of storylines stemming from former President Donald Trump’s Atlanta rally Saturday, beginning with Trump’s bitter attack on Gov. Brian Kemp, his congratulating Vladimir Putin for last week’s prisoner swap, his swipes at Georgia State University, and somewhere in there, his shots at Vice President Kamala Harris.

But in the midst of all this clickbait, something really serious happened, and it hasn’t received the attention it deserves. Trump publicly recognized three members of the State Election Board, who were sitting right in front of the speaker’s podium.

“They’re on fire. They’re doing a great job,” Trump said to cheers from the audience. He said the three board members, Janice Johnston, Rick Jeffares and Janelle King, were “all pitbulls, fighting for honesty, transparency and integrity.”

The first line in the election board’s code of conduct states that members “shall be honest, fair, and avoid any appearance of conflict and/or impropriety.” If sitting on the front row of a major rally basking in praise from a presidential candidate doesn’t look conflicted and improper for an election board member, what does?

Alert . . . Fascism in Progress . . . Alert

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ahh, they must've found the 11,780 votes Trump was looking for a few days before Jan 6.

So far all he managed to find from that phone call was a second impeachment and two indictments.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

This should honestly get taken up by a larger publication with a wider circulation. This is fucked up.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

The fact that it won’t should say all we need to know about the role of corporate news in politics.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I've seen bigger pubs bringing it up frequently, but not this specifically with these people being called at his rallies. That is incredibly blatant.

[-] wesley@yall.theatl.social 16 points 1 month ago

I'm definitely worried about what shenanigans they're going to pull in November. They tried to steal the election in 2020 and they're going to try again....and it seems like they learned a few lessons from the first time

[-] fstrelok@midwest.social 7 points 1 month ago

As others have said, this needs to be covered on the biggest platforms, this is big.

this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
77 points (96.4% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3573 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS