232

Exclusive: Head of engineering for Trump’s Truth Social app resigns (www.reuters.com)

submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The head of engineering for the company that operates former U.S. President Donald Trump’s Truth Social app told Reuters on Monday he had resigned, in a blow for the venture.

top 28 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] fiat_lux@kbin.social 73 points 11 months ago

Alex Gleason, for anyone wondering he's said he's going to work full time on...

open-source technology for “decentralized” social media platforms that operate on independently-run servers and provide an alternative to Twitter and Facebook. ... developing technology for connecting multiple decentralized platforms

Reinventing the fediverse? Watch out for that, I guess.

[-] Wodge@lemmy.world 41 points 11 months ago

Wasn't Truth Social just a mastodon instance to begin with?

[-] fiat_lux@kbin.social 34 points 11 months ago

Apparently the backend still is, just a customised version to exclude poll and post visibility option functionality. I assume there are other changes too, because he and his team swapped the frontend out for their own and made a Web app version. Not much to show for 16 months since launch, really. Embarrassing.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth_Social#Software is a fun read

[-] Kichae@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago

I wouldn't be shocked if someone told me the front end was stolen, too.

[-] unconsciousvoidling@lemmy.one 1 points 11 months ago

Well it wasn’t a good scam. It’s not like Donald trump paid him a single dime for ripping off mastodon.

[-] slorcher@lemmy.ml 35 points 11 months ago

Confediverse

[-] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Covfefeverse

[-] fiat_lux@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago

It's catchy, I'll give you that.

[-] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 32 points 11 months ago

Reinventing the wheel but worse is what the right-wing's always been good at.

If you won't accept them in your club, they'll make their own with Whitejack and Alpha-malesᵗᵐ

[-] JoYo@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

Gleason used to contribute to pleroma before the split.

They prob just wanted a tailor made soapbox.fe and once it was done didn't have any more work.

[-] fiat_lux@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Good to know, I thought there might be something weird about software with a name heavily embedded in Christian theology, so I should have seen that coming.

[-] utopianfiat@lemmy.world 67 points 11 months ago

Truth Social has an estimated 607,000 monthly users, according to data from Similarweb.

Trump had 5.71 million followers on Truth Social

lmao look at all those bots

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago

How many of those 607,000 are also bots?

[-] loulis@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

All of them

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 35 points 11 months ago

I didn't realize that that thing still existed. By now, isn't it just Trump spending a whole hell of a lot of money to talk to himself?

I'd be curious to know how many of his "followers" are actually just bots and accounts made up by his staff so Trump thinks people actually follow him.

Seriously, does anybody of note (or at all, for that matter) actually use that app? I've never seen a non-Trump post. (I refuse to call it a "truth" because truth is something that has never once come out of his mouth.)

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Another comment highlighted the disparity between his “5.x million” followers and 600k or so actual monthly users. And how many of those are bots too you know?

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

I'd also be willing to bet that at least some of his "live" followers are merely journalists who only have an account so they can follow him as part of their job, along with probably all of his employees who are likely required to follow his account as a condition of employment.

[-] Phlogiston@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

I've heard the term "burp" to refer to posts on that platform. As in, "trumps latest Burp is in ALL CAPS".

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Ooh, I like that one.

[-] Toto@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago

Elon will welcome him back with tears in his eyes

[-] Flag@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

Didnt he basically already do that, but the trumpsterfire declined?

[-] BuckRowdy@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

Most people don't like right wing anything. Not really a surprise.

[-] Wiz@midwest.social 17 points 11 months ago

"Right-wing (blank)" is almost always a failure. Like the "right wing dating sites" that are mostly sausage fests looking for brood mares, from what I've heard. LOL

[-] BuckRowdy@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

I read an article a few months ago from someone on twitter that was able to gain access to the newest one, the right stuff I think it was. The reports of the profile pics of guys in front of confederate flags with dozens of guns displayed around and the other things she saw there were hilarious. It was exactly as you say, no real women, just a bunch of guys that most women would never give a second look.

[-] ohlaph@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

They all seem like con runs. Quickly con a base and dip.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

Here's something to ponder.

Why don't any of Trump's high-profile lackeys actually use Trump's twitter knock-off if it's supposed to be this bastion of conservative speech?

[-] MimicJar@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Not sure if rhetorical but the simplest answer is that it doesn't "own the libs".

Whatever Trump says is immediately (for some reason) picked up by a bunch of other places so he gets all the attention. I assume this is why he hasn't moved back to Twitter (I believe his exclusivity deal has ended).

Although I always assumed Musk/Twitter would "acquire" Truth Social for an undisclosed sum (probably $1). It gives Musk the "free speech" argument (which is fucking stupid but we live in stupid times) and it gives Trump the "excellent businessman" story (again, fucking stupid) while also giving him a clean exit.

Of course there is another reason, everyone hates Trump. He is a useful idiot so they'll say "good job" and "great idea" but no one actually believes in him. Yes he can make fools dance, which is a useful ability, but it will only get you so far. If Trump wasn't a piece of shit I'd probably feel bad for him. But he is, fuck em.

[-] JoYo@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

they're working on nostr now

https://soapbox.pub/blog/soapbox-awarded-grant/

this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023

232 points (96.0% liked)

politics

18065 readers

4342 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News