this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
218 points (98.7% liked)

science

20793 readers
238 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fart_pickle@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I've been reading about various breakthroughs in battery world for past decade or so. So far none ended up in a consumer product.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can go and buy sodium batteries already. They're not competitive with Lithium ion batteries in many mobile applications, but very much competitive for everything where price is more important than size or weight.

Lithium has decades of research and industrial scaling behind it, it's hard to break into that. But especially sodium is on a pretty good path to replace it in large scale storage applications.

[–] fart_pickle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sodium-ion batteries have been in development since 1970s and the lithium-ion batteries have been in development since 1960s. Not much of a difference.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's not just the amount of time. The portable electronics market and the electric car market both settled on lithium batteries, which created a huge demand for that particular technology. Over the past 2 decades there has been a massive incentive to develop smaller, denser lithium batteries.

There may be interest in developing other battery technologies, but nothing like the amount of money and effort being spent on lithium batteries.

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And before that there were several decades of massive incentive to develop smaller more powerful ICE engines.

Lithium probably has some room to grow, but it also has a lot of problems like volatility and materials sourcing. EV manufacturers have been searching for ways to make better/cheaper/denser batteries, not better/cheaper/denser lithium batteries. They've been actively searching for alternatives.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

EV manufacturers have been searching for ways to make better/cheaper/denser batteries, not better/cheaper/denser lithium batteries.

Sure, it's the lithium battery manufacturers that are invested in making better lithium batteries. Everyone has been buying their products for decades and they want that to keep happening, so they pour resources into research and development. And they have a lot of resources, because everyone has been buying their products.

Once a market settles on a particular technology it becomes self-feeding and tends to accelerate. It's difficult for a competing technology to break in primarily because of momentum - it's hard to catch up.

A device manufacturer might be interested in using a different battery technology, but if they have a whole design and production process already built around lithium batteries then it's not just the battery that they have to change. It's their logistics chain, on-device electronics, design theory and possible regulatory concerns. Changing an established system is expensive, so that has to be justified somehow.

I'm not saying that it can't happen - I'm sure that it will eventually. What I'm saying is that in order for a different battery technology to really change the market and push lithium out, it will have to be significantly better (not just marginally better).

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I've been reading about battery breakthroughs for decades. And I remember when the latest in battery tech was alkaline, then Ni-Cd, then Li-Ion, and now LiPo. All of those have ended up in consumer products.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Also, the battery pack for a cell phone 30 years ago was about the same volume and weight of an entire smartphone, with a capacity of about 500 mAh. They are also far cheaper if you account for inflation.

Batteries have improved incapacity by about a factor of 10 and the cost per watt-hour has reduced by about 99% in the last 30 year. All without a single advancement in the technology, apparently.

/s

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't call it a single advancement but hundreds. The materials might be largely the same but manufacturing is huge. When you roll up some metal to make a battery then increasing the number of layers is a huge challange when they're already tiny.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Spur4383@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You skipped Ni-MH there, that was major for not having the memory problems of Ni-Cd. We still use those in AA and AAA rechargeable batteries.

[–] FreeLikeGNU@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ni-MH production for EVs was effectively shutdown by Texaco and later Chevron through patent acquisitions.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_encumbrance_of_large_automotive_NiMH_batteries

Holy shit. I had no idea.

Chevron is pretty fucking evil for a lot of reasons, but we’ll add this one to the pile, I guess.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

totally TIL worthy

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ni-MH ~~is~~ was also in a lot of hybrid cars.

[–] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are they still making NiMH hybrid packs?

Lithium is far superior

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

I don't know in general. I was recently shopping for a UX 250h and I know they only just switched to lithium for the 2025 model with the nx name change.

Toyota switched the camry hybrid from NiMH to lithium for the 2020 model year.

In my head I meant hybrid cars on the road, not necessarily in new production.

[–] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

A little pedantic note, LiPo is still a type of Li-Ion (maybe I got that right)

and the bigger recent breakthrough was LFP (Lithium iron phosphate / LiFePO4)

And probably safe to call Sodium-Ion and solid state the next big phases of development

[–] ammonium@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

LFP is actually a relatively old battery technology, it's only now that the patent is expired that it's starting to breakthrough (outside of China, they somehow got a license if I understand it correctly).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The same thing happened with a lot of awesome things you're using right now. But I understand your impatience.

[–] cymbal_king@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

QuantumScape is currently building the mass production line for a solid state battery and has been sending prototypes out to their auto manufacturer clients for testing.

This Undecided with Matt Ferrell video has a good breakdown.

Disclosure: I own 100 shares of QS

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Vertelleus@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This seems like a pretty big deal, right?

[–] P1r4nha@feddit.de 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Indeed, the fact that they filed a patent is also an indicator that this is not purely an experiment, but a tangible way forward. Let's hope this can scale up quickly.

it's not just another article about a new revolutionary discovery because that's the only way to have funds?

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

There's a pile of battery patents that are all game-changing but when a company decides to make a dedicated factory that's when you know shit is going down.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 year ago

Eh, the patent office hasn't had standards for practically for like a century, just that you describe a novel method

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yup. Studies on sodium batteries has been going on for years. If they finally achieve good enough state this is big since lithium is limited and expensive while sodium is everywhere. However sodium batteries will never be effective as lithium batteries because of the atom size. Lithium is much smaller than sodium.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Well we are in dire need of grid size storage so this is excellent then.

[–] BehindTheBarrier@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True, but this is solid state so it may be higher density than current Lithium based batteries. But it might not beat a hypothetical lithium solid state battery. On the other hand, sodium batteries today beat out lithium in many other ways than capacity, and if those things are true for solid state then as long as there is a big enough jump in capacity due to the solid state transition then I think sodium is going to be the go-to for most uses in the future.

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Don't actually know about density differences but I'm quite positive that sodium batteries will be used in many sectors because it will be much cheaper. Probably not on cars, maybe not on phones as well. It will be enough for all other small appliances I think.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wait... did they do all three?

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

“Global action requires working together to access critically important materials,” Meng said.

So... nope.

[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Huh ?

What information are you trying to convey by quoting that sentence from the article?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] fubbernuckin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But the materials are more easily accessible for sodium. It's just supposed to have less capacity by volume.

Edit: that portion of the article you mentioned is talking about lithium ion

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

there should be 4th bubble "easy"

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

that's what fast is for.

[–] brlemworld@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Probably not fast. You would have to setup tooling and manufacturing and supply chain. That takes years.

[–] Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ah, these are the aluminum dust under pressure solid state batteries. I wonder how much pressure.

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It does say "during assembly [...] to form a solid current collector while maintaining a liquid-like contact with the electrolyte".

After it's made it could be not under pressure at all.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They have the pressure of reversing climate change so very high pressure

[–] Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

The decarbonization of our power grid will thankfully not be up to a single technology, but a multitude which are all seeing development simultaneously. Solar is reaching for better efficiency and less harmful creation, batteries of all shapes, sizes, and concepts are popping up from everywhere. It feels more like a race now than a slow decline into uninhabitability.

[–] vin@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago

Any way to read the paper published without subscribing to nature?

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Shirley Meng's showing off her lemon jacket and big watch drip. Power on.

load more comments
view more: next ›