GreyEyedGhost

Or even median income.

A perfect 5/7.

I like the performative glass-wearing. I've never seen her wear glasses before, but glasses make you look smarter, and she needs to look smarter right now, not angrier. So she has glasses on, but they're pushed down her nose so she can still see over them. You might argue that she needs them for reading, but she could just get progressives and wear them normally.

Absolutely, but then you should have picked a better group to compare them to.

If people were doing this, how would you know? And if other people aren't, what do you expect the people who are to do about it? Are you hoping for a Streets of New York scene where the non-intrusive Christians duke it out with the loudmouthed Christians until only one group is left?

I'm not saying what you're saying is wrong, it just doesnt address the question of the guy who responded to you.

Sure, but that's a very low bar.

But we are. It's about our behavior, not the subject we're acting on.

Your perception of what a psychopath is colored by media portrayals and what notable psychopaths have done. Not all physicists are like Richard Feynman, and they're all at least reasonably smart.

What you're describing is a psychopath who is stupid. They do stupid things because they are stupid, and they do psychopath things because they're a psychopath. They aren't going to lead the police on a chase across the country after a string of murders. If they kill someone, they'll probably be caught the very first time. The reason they will kill will be somewhat less nuanced than an intelligent psychopath's reasons, but that's the smart vs. stupid difference - they're both psychopaths. Neither will feel remorse, neither will feel any compelling need to achieve their goals by not harming someone else, and both would do it again if they felt the circumstances warranted it. One will just do it in a way where he might not get caught and the other won't think that far ahead or will do such a poor job of it that thinking ahead won't help.

Intelligence and good behavior aren't inherently linked. Also, there's good evidence that some part of the Neanderthal population was bred into modern humans.

I had a mouse problem once upon a time, and the new "humane" traps didn't actually kill them. I got tired of bludgeoning them with a shovel and drowned one, thinking it would be easier. That was brutal and horrific, and I went back to using the shovel.

There is nothing humane about drowning an animal.

I wouldn't say killing animals is categorically psychopathic, but killing them inhumanely certainly is.

If they have control of updates, they can withhold updates or deliver malicious updates. So they may not be able to make them drop out of the sky*, but they can send an update that makes them completely unable to take off, or even crash upon takeoff.

*But they could install a kill command to turn off engines when a signal is received.