73
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 75 points 4 days ago

I’m voting for whoever the D is, even if it’s a fucking corpse. Brandon should fuck off. Christ on a shitstick, the election is going to hinge on voters at the margins, those fucking morons who can’t decide between an obvious traitor and a declining, yet vastly superior, democratic president. They are the asscunts in whose hands our collective future lies. Brandon isn’t going to save us. Sad as it is, it remains for some charismatic figure to win over those fucking idiots and save the Republic.

load more comments (35 replies)
[-] Zeke@fedia.io 33 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I am registered as an independent. I would like to vote third party eventually, but this is not the time and I think switching the candidate will backfire. We are playing with fire here. When it comes to voting between keeping a democracy or putting ourselves into a dictatorship, I'm voting for democracy. The people who are "protesting" by not voting or by voting third party this term are advocating for a Trump win. It's an attempt to divide the party in the same way that they did when Hillary was running. If Trump wins, democracy dies and genocide will be encouraged. Don't forget, he supported wiping out Gaza and encourages violence against other races, religions, political views, and LGBTQ+ people. He'll wipe out democracy and everything we've worked for over hundreds of years. All the protections put in place against poisoning the planet will be gone and climate change policies wiped out. This man plans to do so much damage.

I'll be honest. I'm scared of a loss here. I'm trans and with the amount of vitriol Trump and his followers spew, I feel like if I don't vote this way, I'm getting put in a dangerous situation, as are all LGBTQ+ people and many others. Please don't fuck around here. Don't make this about your pride. There is too much at risk here. Vote Biden and keep voting in mid-terms as well. We don't stand a chance otherwise.

Protesters, if you really want to make a change, run for congress. The only way to make real change is to put more decent critical thinking people in congress.

[-] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

Lemmy's IQ is probably above average. We're all going to vote for the NotTrump party, because the alternative is so much worse. It's the rest of the country who, honestly speaking, aren't going to bother.

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 9 points 3 days ago

There’s a fuck ton of clowns here that are not voting.

[-] xenomor@lemmy.world 32 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Some in this thread think that ‘chaos’ would emerge if the party replaced Biden and that would hurt the party’s chance of defeating trump. You are correct that there would be a media frenzy, and weeks of exhaustive, drama chasing coverage. It would absolutely dominate the media narrative, and be pounded into the entire voting population’s psyche. You know what else? That would be a wonderful, wonderful thing. It would totally disarm trump’s ability to drive the media narrative for much of the rest of the election. Whatever deficit that exists of national awareness for the new candidate would be erased very quickly. That candidate would be gifted months of desperate, free, media coverage. It’s actually a great strategy. That being the case, I’m sure the DNC and the party elders will never attempt something so obviously effective since they are terrible at politics and their cowardly approaches to both campaigns and governing are ultimately the reason our democracy is in such an existential crisis to begin with.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 40 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

For one, Biden would have to willingly give up the nomination in order to release delegates already pledged to him.

Factually not true...

The DNC can rewrite the rules before the convention and nominate anyone they want.

As their lawyers have told judges, they're a private organization that can name anyone as the candidate. That was their defense for accusations that they already rig primaries.

A second problem is the public doesn’t know any other Democrat nearly as well as they know Biden, and it would be difficult to introduce someone to the public at this late date without them being defined by Donald Trump, the Republicans and Fox News in the worst possible ways.

Literally anyone that becomes the Dem nominee will have nationwide name recognition in 24 hours.

The most common reason for voting Biden is "to stop trump" so any replacement shares the most important quality Dem voters want that Biden actually meets.

Like, sure, this would have been so much easier if we had an actual primary and the people closest to Biden hadn't spent four years hiding him and lying about his mental capabilities. But they didn't. They kept repeating it was too late for anyone except Biden.

They're still saying it, but it's still not true.

[-] Poayjay@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago

Good points. However, I would argue that the DNC would absolutely fuck up picking a new nominee. They would pick some “centrist” unlikeable democrat that would try to appeal to a moderate middle that just doesn’t exist. They would run a flaccid campaign and manage to piss off everybody trying to appeal to everybody. Republicans would absolutely capitalize on the chaos.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

In before they nominate fucking Hillary... again. It would be one thing to claim name recognition if people actually liked Biden, but nobody fucking likes Biden. People stomach Biden because the alternative is so much worse. This is why we so desperately need some kind of proportional voting system, literally any kind. The public needs a way of telling the parties "here's how we feel about these issues" without it being a binary choice between bad and even worse.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Right

Biden appointed Jamie Harrison, it's very very unlikely that Jamie Harrison nominates anyone else. And if he does, it will be another moderate that names Jamie Harrison head of the DNC again.

Because the people running the DNC care more about personal political power than stopping trump.

Just like the problem with republicans isn't just trump, it's the people behind the scenes that also need addressed.

The problem with the DNC isn't just Biden, it's the people Biden put in charge of the DNC.

The party can't survive without the voters, we're the important part.

If the DNC refuses to acknowledge that, it won't be the first time voters left a party behind to die without them.

At a certain point the corruption is bad enough we need to start over. It won't be easy, but at a certain point it's the only option.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago

Regardless of whether we stay with Biden or someone new is chosen (God, what a shitshow that will be - though depending on the discussions behind the scenes, it may be the best course)...

Vote Dem on the presidential ticket this November. Biden or his replacement. Doesn't matter.

You've got a guy who tried the first autocoup in US history on the ballot, and a good 48% of the electorate who wants him back in. Not even getting into the myriad other problems.

Don't play fucking games here.

[-] bquintb@midwest.social 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Idk. He seemed fine as usual the day after at his rally. I don't know what the hell that was on debate night. Someone idiot gave him NyQuil because of a cold or something??

Anyway, no, I don't think it's a good idea to replace him unless it's someone like Gavin Newsome who has no problem being aggressive against the Orange Mussolini.

[-] Hello_there@fedia.io 21 points 4 days ago

The pod save America group had a mini debate about the issue.
Two key things: A new candidate allows Dems to sidestep the Gaza issue A new candidate means the age issue vanishes.

As to 'its just a bad debate' - it is the worst presidential debate in modern history. That's a tough thing to climb out from.

Imo, I hope one of the candidates die from natural causes before the conventions and sidestep this craziness altogether.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

Absolute best case scenario, Biden dies of natural causes and Trump rots in jail. Only concerning thing in that scenario is that I'm not convinced Trump being in jail is enough to stop the morons from voting for him.

[-] Aphelion@lemm.ee 18 points 4 days ago

No, best case is Biden kicks it and Trump has a massive stroke on stage at a rally, that leaves half his face dropping and him unable to speak. Anything short of him being completely mentally disabled and disqualified from the ballot isn't enough. Prison will never stop his run even if he's sentenced.

[-] Yearly1845@reddthat.com 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

THE DERP STATE PUT CHEMICALS IN THE WATER AND MADE TRUMP HAVE A STROKE ITS EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT IF THEY CAN GET TO HIM THEY CAN GET TO YOU NO OME IS SAFE YOUR FAMILY IS IN IMMEDIATE HARM JUST LOOK WHAT THEY DID TO THE SMARTEREST MAN ALIVE NO OME IS SAFE UOU ARE IN DAMGER VOTE FOR TRUMP TO FINALLY STOP THE DERP STATE ONLY BY VOTING FOR DUMP CAN WE FINALLY SaVE AmERicA FROM THE CLUTCHES OF TYRRANY AT THE HANDS OF THE VILE BIDEN CRIME FAMILY.

These people live in their own delusional fantasy land and literally nothing will change their minds. My own father thinks Trump had a stunning performance at the debate and is literally enraged at me and everyone around him for not voting for dump. Donald trump is the sole source of truth for him. I'm pretty sure ol Donnie could say the sky is purple and the moon is fake and my dad would believe him.

[-] Aphelion@lemm.ee 6 points 4 days ago

Yes, totally agree, his supporters will make up all sorts of unhinged conspiracy theories, but it won't change his medical inability to execute to the duties of the POTUS. We just need some solid article 25 material.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 6 points 4 days ago

And it's not just a single debate, it's a thing people will recognize from their own elderly relatives' declines. They'll be sharp as a tack at some times and in some situations and in others they'll be confused and incoherent. There's no reason to believe this is a one-off incident that won't reoccur publicly during the next 4 months. We've already been seeing some questionable senior moments that have been brushed aside as being out of context or just some simple mistake unrelated to age. Who really believes those narratives after seeing the debate?

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

A second problem is the public doesn’t know any other Democrat nearly as well as they know Biden, and it would be difficult to introduce someone to the public at this late date without them being defined by Donald Trump, the Republicans and Fox News in the worst possible ways.

The only people I can think of as possible nominees are Kamala Harris, Gretchen Whitmer, Josh Shapiro, Wes Moore, Gavin Newsom and (my personal favorite) Sherrod Brown.

. . . What? Of those names I recognize I’m pretty sure the faded lettuce of Liz Truss has more immediate electability. And Whitmer is right out. As is (don’t get me started) Harris.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Harris is the most viable option, but she's also less charismatic than Biden, and is a "Monkey's Paw" style answer to those on the left calling for a non-Biden candidate.

[-] BabyVi@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Is she less charismatic than current Biden though..? I haven't seen her speak in awhile but from what I remember it wasn't that bad. Not a fan of her politics by any stretch but right now I'd support her in a heartbeat.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Is she less charismatic than current Biden though…?

Biden after the debate? Definitely less charismatic.

Biden during the debate? Probably less charismatic.

I've seen her get flustered by enough softball questions to have no faith in her ability to persuade the electorate of her competence, regardless of whether she is competent or not.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

It's fucking amazing that these are the DNC's top 2 picks out of 350 million people.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
73 points (74.8% liked)

politics

18072 readers
3051 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS