this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
55 points (100.0% liked)

Chat

7499 readers
6 users here now

Relaxed section for discussion and debate that doesn't fit anywhere else. Whether it's advice, how your week is going, a link that's at the back of your mind, or something like that, it can likely go here.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If a game hypes a lot of people up, it will be verified. That’s like, the most important factor… not even the performance, the controls, etc…

As seen in the title, Baldur’s Gate 3 is the perfect example of this: running at 20FPS with constant dips and my Steam Deck on the verge of exploding isn’t what I call “a game flawlessly running on the Steam Deck…”

Just try to be honest guys, it’s okay if the game is badly rated for compatibility with the Steam Deck, it’s not a big deal if it’s too demanding to run on the handled.

But DON’T BE MISLEADING

Thanks :))

EDIT: Not tested on the most recent major update. The big one with many changes to the flow of the game.

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I've been playing it fine on the steam deck. 30fps and looks good enough. Make sure you have fsr on.

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

Yeah same here, on act 2 and so far it's been perfectly fine for me. Occasional dips below 30fps but nothing unplayable.

[–] Jaxseven@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Not to mention the community controls are great. Larin did a fantastic job adapting the game to a controller, but I much prefer the flexibility of keyboard and mouse and the Deck's input options are fantastic.

[–] noctisatrae@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is misleading. Having played the game with optimised settings and FSR, it does look good but no matter the settings, there are countless dips, without any interruptions.

What you wanted to say is… the game runs at 30FPS as long as your are not outside. The game is so unstable that saying 30FPS is kinda false actually.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah it runs at 30 anywhere for me. Maybe it dips occasionally but it's mostly 30fps.

I don't even think my settings are good. I should be able to get it to look better and still run at 30fps. I turned off my frame cap and I'm getting 37 fps outside.

My presets are pretty much everything on medium and fsr off

[–] noctisatrae@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Well! Give them to me because if it works, what a blessing!

[–] joshinator@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

To be fair, BG3 just runs like crap. I'm playing it mostly on a decent PC, there were some dips in act 1 and 2, but act 3 has a lot more dips.
Still a great game, and the city maps in act 3 are pretty packed, but the frametime consistency is pretty poor.

And Vulkan was even worse, slighly lower avg FPS, same inconsistency and graphic glitches (random flickering black or white squares).

I see the "verified" badge more as a "no need to fiddle to get the game running" not a "you get locked 30fps with decent graphics" guarantee.
Always subjective what "runs well", someone might be accustomed to 4k@144hz while someone else is used to "cinematic" 30fps.
Both will notice the unstable 30fps, but the latter wont mind, just like most players didn't mind with Zelda TotK.

[–] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 26 points 1 year ago

Bg3 plays fine for me in deck. Enable fsr.

[–] AphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My dude, have you turned on FSR? I'm getting 35-45fps on the Deck, and the experience has been pretty smooth so far.

[–] noctisatrae@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] AphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, FSR 1 ain't pretty, but it gets the job done, and it's all BG3 has. I also turned down all the critical settings like shadows to low. You can't see the fine details on shadows anyway when playing the deck, so no point wasting resources on them. Same thing for fog, turn that shit to low. Everything else should be set to medium.

You'll probably not get as much FPS as I do, because I've tweaked my Deck a lot, but you should have no issues getting a solid 30fps on average, which is what most people report. I spend about half my time on BG3 on my Deck, because I play it at work, and it runs really well for me, so I know you can get there too with minor adjustments!

[–] Willdrick@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I don't own a Deck, but from trying on smaller screens (1366x768 laptop) fsr is practically indistinguishable from native at "quality" preset. "Balanced" becomes a bit blurrier, but still pretty much playable, without sacrificing UI legibility

[–] AphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

It's usually not very noticeable, but there's a lot of face time in the game when talking to people, and that's when you really notice it. It's not a deal breaker though, because when you use a platform like the Deck, you accept that not every game is going to look its best. And the rest of the experience with BG3 is fantastic on the Deck. I prefer moving with a joystick over the point and click movement of the KB/M for this game.

[–] termus@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah on the decks screen it's not really noticeable. It's great for handheld mode. Once I docked it to my 1080p TV it was very noticeable blurry mess. That's when I decided to just Stream it over Sunshine from my desktop.

[–] Templa@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago

I'd say most games are completely playable but aren't verified, not the other way around.

[–] Mars@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have at least 60h in my play through, all of them on the steamdeck. Good enough for me.

Not saying other games are no getting certification they should not but BG3 on the deck is not bad at all.

[–] Lowbird@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I think difficulty setting, how often you get into combat, and how far you are into the game might affect it. In my playthrough it was fine for a long time but now every now and then it hangs a bit when it's calculating enemy turns, even with my good CPU.

[–] manapropos@lemmy.basedcount.com 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don’t even bother trying to run newer games on steam deck. If it doesn’t run at 60 fps docked on 720p with FSR I’ll wait for the next iteration. I’m a couch gamer and always will be

[–] ask@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You should really try embracing the 40fps screen refresh rate. It's actually half way between 30fps and 60fps by frame time so it looks a lot smoother than you'd think.

Nothing else has a screen that can actually do 40 Hz refresh so you usually can't use 40 fps because it wouldn't align with the screen refreshes.

40 fps unlocks a ton of games for the steam deck to run well.

40 is fine if I’m just playing on the Deck’s small screen but I prefer playing on the TV where 60 is better

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know how it is on the Steam Deck, but on PC, 40 is unplayable and 50 is barely playable.

[–] greenskye@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you only play docked, it'd probably be better to have a full PC hooked up to your TV than a steamdeck

[–] manapropos@lemmy.basedcount.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t have money for a full PC lmao

[–] greenskye@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Fair. Even if you went cheap/second hand it's probably more than a steam deck

[–] regalia@literature.cafe 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Should it be a rating for how well it runs on Steam Deck, or how compatible it is with proton?

[–] noctisatrae@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well if it’s called Steam Deck’s verified, I thought that logically it would indicate how well it ran on the Steam Deck

[–] Lowbird@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Absolutely. Particularly since "does this work with the steam decks controls and screen size" is part of it.

I've never found it to be a reliable rating, tbh.