227
This is actually one I've been waiting for. It's about goddamn time some of these jackasses start seeing the inside of a courtroom for defying congressional subpoenas.
💀
Flashback:
Under Navarro's plan, dubbed the "Green Bay Sweep," former Vice President Mike Pence was to send disputed election results back to the states, thereby forcing hours of debate on Capitol Hill.
"It was a perfect plan," Navarro said in an interview late last year with the Daily Beast. "And it all predicated on peace and calm on Capitol Hill. We didn't even need any protesters, because we had over 100 congressmen committed to it."
Now that the masterminds behind the plan to end democracy in America in order to install an unelected dictator are seeing some consequences, how about we also go after co-conspirators like those "over 100 congressmen" who were so happy to go along with it?
Imagine if we like really did "drain the swamp" and suddenly started holding all these fucks accountable and just replaced them all with people who will really work for our best interests?
Start with the Republican congressmen who spent fucking July 4 as guests in Russia attending off-the-record meetings with Russian counterparts
💀
For me, it’s been tough waiting for the grownups to get their plans completely finished to be able to crush these people.
The morons took the quiet as a permission to keep spewing out incriminating evidence.
I kept screaming NOW!, but the grownups said not now, they are still digging their own graves.
So this is really fun
And FYI Trump can't exert executive privilege NOW because he isn't the executive anymore. Biden could exert that privilege on his behalf, but good luck with that.
Fuck Navarro! Fuck, fuck Navarro!
I could have swore this was already decided, but I guess it has to be done case by case...
Oh no!... Anyway...
I thought that was Tommy Lee Jones.
Wish version Tommy Lee Jones.
Looks more like Sir Anthony Hopkins in the thumbnail imo
Tommy lee jones would punch you straight in the mouth for that comment.
He drank it, at lunch!
this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
227 points (99.6% liked)
politics
19090 readers
3876 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS