this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
183 points (98.9% liked)

News

35692 readers
2790 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The proposed rule would lift the salary threshold for overtime pay from $35,568 to $55,000.

all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] roofuskit@kbin.social 33 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Remember when Obama did this exact thing and Trump just immediately undid it when he became president?

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

And all his constituents that he was screwing over cheered him for being "a smart businessman".

[–] MrLuemasG@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If I recall correctly, it got overturned by a Federal Court before Trump took office. Trump WOULD have undone it - but he didn't have to.

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/11/22/503081151/federal-judge-blocks-obama-administrations-overtime-pay-rule

[–] roofuskit@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

You do not recall correctly.

https://www.epi.org/press/the-trump-administrations-overtime-rule-leaves-millions-of-workers-behind/

His justice department didn't defend the rule and then he replaced it with a much weaker version.

[–] roux@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 2 years ago

Cool and I propose we make the minimum wage a living wage instead.

[–] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

This would hit millions of teachers.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Salary threshold? I'm salaried. I don't get overtime. Neither do a lot of other salaried people.

[–] hypelightfly@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

2x minimum wage for a 40 hour work week is the salary threshold. If you make less your employer is breaking the law. In California the salary threshold is currently $64,480.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm bad at math, but I'm pretty sure I make more than that. I live in Indiana. Minimum wage is sickeningly low. $7.25/hr.

[–] hypelightfly@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

That's federal minimum wage. So it's the $35,568 from the article which Biden is trying to raise to $55,000.

[–] janNatan@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Do you make more than $35,568?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I do not. My job sucks and I deserve higher pay.

[–] janNatan@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I believe that if you make below that threshold as a salaried employee and do not receive overtime pay for hours worked over 40 per week, then your employer may be violating a rule.

Wage theft is the largest category of theft in the USA.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I wouldn't be shocked if there was wage theft going on, but there's also no way to record my hours. No one to keep track of it.

[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That sounds remarkably convenient for your employer.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Like I said, the job sucks.

[–] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Why aren't you keeping track of it? The labor board exists. Use it.

[–] 0110010001100010@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

I'm curious what you do where you are salaried with that low of a pay. Totally understand if you don't want to share though.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Aww salaried people, not hourly

[–] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago

Hourly people already get these overtime pay protections

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 years ago

Imagine being told that you have to work for free because they deem you worked too many hours in a world where you can hardly make enough to pay for rent let alone buy a house.

[–] rafadavidc@ttrpg.network -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

""""""""""proposal""""""""""

Good luck. This isn't going anywhere.

[–] roofuskit@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It was already done by Obama and then undone by Trump. It does not need congressional intervention.

[–] MrLuemasG@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It got overturned by a Federal Court before Trump took office. Trump WOULD have undone it - but he didn't have to.

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/11/22/503081151/federal-judge-blocks-obama-administrations-overtime-pay-rule

[–] roofuskit@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

You should look up the words "preliminary" and "injunction."

https://www.epi.org/press/the-trump-administrations-overtime-rule-leaves-millions-of-workers-behind/

His justice department didn't defend the rule and then he replaced it with a much weaker version.

[–] rafadavidc@ttrpg.network 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

that sounds an awful lot like not having gone anywhere.

[–] roofuskit@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

It went somewhere, and came back. It was the law of the land for a brief time.