new sharkey instance now open: cyberpunk.gay (cyberpunk.gay)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by vantablack@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cyberpunk.gay is now open for registrations!!!

WHO ARE WE? we’re a scrappy little fresh-faced underdog instance of sharkey (a misskey fork). we have but one humbly stated mission: to put the PUNK back into cyberpunk on the fediverse

WHO AM I? i’m vanta. trans enby girl polyam lesbian gender terrorist, the fediverse’s favorite pirate radio DJ, DIY clothing auteur, and rogue wordsmith extraordinaire. i’ve been posting on fedi heavily since 2017

THREADS? not only is this instance a fedipact instance that has threads.net blocked, but… i’m the one who made the whole pact to begin with lmao

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago

I have nothing to substantiate this but the chuds may be mad about it

[-] vantablack@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 3 months ago

[removed by mod]

[-] FozzyOsbourne@lemm.ee 17 points 3 months ago

trans enby girl polyam lesbian gender terrorist

Can you explain to us old farts what this actually means? Like I thought I knew what all the individual words mean but aren't non-binary and girl mutually exclusive? And isn't trans implied by enby anyway?

I'd guess the shitty comments are from people dismissing this as a pile of buzzwords, hopefully if they can understand better then they'll be less shitty :)

[+] vantablack@lemmy.blahaj.zone -19 points 3 months ago

[removed by mod]

[-] RIPandTERROR@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 months ago

Kinda a dick response to what was a considerately, sensitively asked question.

[-] nicknonya@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

the dickishness is likely due to that last paragraph:

I'd guess the shitty comments are from people dismissing this as a pile of buzzwords, hopefully if they can understand better then they'll be less shitty :)

this makes it seem like the fault for the chuds behavior relies on op for not being clear enough with their labels, as opposed to with the chuds deciding that someone's chosen self descriptors are somehow incorrect.

this is not helped by how bigots excuse their behavior as just wanting a Fair and Rational Discussion™, ignoring that what they want to "discuss" about is the validity of someone's whole existence.

[+] vantablack@lemmy.blahaj.zone -14 points 3 months ago

[removed by mod]

[-] unconfirmedsourcesDOTgov@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 3 months ago

It certainly isn't a paid role, but in my experience those who seek to marginalize often do so with a whole lot of ignorance involved.

You continue to be under no obligation to help educate the blind, but if you knew going into this that some people would have comments and questions about the impressive number of labels you've applied to yourself, it just feels like you're setting yourself up to get mad on the internet at this point. Otherwise why bother including them in your post at all?