164
submitted 3 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Just following the logic of "If Kamala doesn't confirm my bias, she must be lying."

And her statement is not "self-contradictory". She thinks Biden said hurtful things in the past but she doesn't think he is racist.

Frankly that could apply to a lot of white people. So if you don't understand how she can truthfully say those things, that's on you.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago

She thinks Biden said ~~hurtful~ racist things in the past but she doesn't think he is racist.

Which would mean she was being disingenuous or wrong.

It doesn't get much more racist than protesting desegregation bussing because "I don't want my kids to grow up in a racial jungle".

That's almost Trumpian levels of turning the dog whistle into a bullhorn.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

She thinks Biden said ~~hurtful~ racist things in the past but she doesn't think he is racist.

Bruh, my post is right above yours. Everyone can see you intentionally misquoted me. And intentionally misquoted Kamala.

"I don't want my kids to grow up in a racial jungle".

Why do you keep making up quotes? Is it because you think your version sounds worse than the actual quote or is it because you haven't bothered to find the actual quote?

It doesn't get much more racist

You might think so, but this is not about whether you think he's racist. The question is what Kamala thinks, and she already said she doesn't agree with you.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago

"I don't want my kids to grow up in a racial jungle".

Why do you keep making up quotes

I'm not. I misremembered the exact wording, but here's his statement against desegregation bussing in full:

Unless we do something about this, my children are going to grow up in a jungle, the jungle being a racial jungle with tensions having built so high that it is going to explode at some point. We have got to make some move on this.

Under the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964, the federal Department of Health, Education and Welfare had a powerful tool to fight school segregation: It could withhold funding from districts that refused to integrate — and integration effectively meant busing. Mr. Helms wanted to strip the agency of that power.

As Mr. Biden rose on the Senate floor in September 1975 to embrace that approach, Mr. Helms wryly welcomed him "to the ranks of the enlightened." Mr. Biden objected to the education department mandating desegregation absent a court order, and warned of white flight to the suburbs and even racial unrest. ... Mr. Helms's amendment, which would have also barred the education department from collecting data about the race of students or teachers, failed. But a slightly narrower measure written by Mr. Biden, which prevented schools from using federal dollars to assign teachers or students by race, passed, 50-43.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Did you also misremember my post? I didn't say Kamala thinks Biden said racist things, and she didn't say that either.

Anyway, you might think that statement makes Biden a racist, and that's your prerogative. But Kamala does not have to agree with you.

Maybe she thinks it was a hurtful thing to say but that's not enough to make Biden a racist. Maybe she thinks it doesn't reflect who Biden is today. There are countless other possible explanations for her position, and ultimately she doesn't need you to tell her what she thinks.

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Misremembering something where wording is important, then presenting it as fact is very close to lying.

this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
164 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19098 readers
4753 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS