this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
86 points (93.0% liked)

Technology

72840 readers
2811 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/17926125

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Just for comparison: the energy density of gasoline and diesel is around 10,000 Wh/kg.

Never knew about this metric before.

I’m looking forward to the instant benefits for e-bikes!

[–] IHeartBadCode@kbin.run 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The thing is when gasoline is used to power a car about 80% of the energy is loss to heat and only about 20% is used to actually move the car on average. It’s worse when you are doing acceleration and better when cruising at a steady speed on a level surface.

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, so you have to divide it by a factor of 5. Which still makes gasoline roughly 5 times as energy dense than this prototype battery, instead of 25 times.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Another problem is the increased complexity of fossil fuel vehicles, specifically in stuff like the engine, gears, pollution filters, etc. A fossil fuel vehicle is just intrinsically more complicated. Which doesn't directly relate to the density, but it gives electric vehicles an advantage.

[–] neshura@bookwormstory.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] axsyse@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

Which is where hybrids have a huge advantage, getting the best of both worlds

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The weight itself is an engineering challenge.

With passenger vehicles, the problems have largely been solved. With motorcycles, there are still some tradeoffs on range (especially highway). With large cargo trucks, the weight causes issues with range, weight capacity, and charging times. With aircraft, there's not really competition on the horizon.

And electrification of heat production itself for climate control, cooking, hot water, industrial processes, etc. is coming along, too, on an application by application basis. (But note that the energy "lost" to heat is less of a factor for these uses.)

[–] espentan@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

In general efficiency, modern cars are a lot closer to 40% than 20. E.g. a Prius engine is at 38,5%.

It was interesting to see F1 engines go past the 50% mark, a few years back.

load more comments (5 replies)