57
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
57 points (100.0% liked)
chat
8165 readers
426 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
This is the energy I've been having about my former partner (I don't like saying the word "ex" for some reason) with whom I broke up with very recently. I was the one who asked her out, I was deeply into her, and I really appreciated how kind she was to me, but I started to realize that we were at odds in some ways, especially since she was rather libby. She ended up eventually being more in love with me than I was with her, but I couldn't take it.
With this in mind, I have a list of five things that I require my partner to have in common with me, and she missed the mark in some way, shape, or form on practically all fronts. I actually am so strict with my requirements that I had to conceptualize what all of the nuances around them look like on paper. This is my "dating requirements manifesto:"
Angel's Dating Requirements Manifesto [Quite Long]
For me to be comfortable with entering a long-term relationship with someone, they have to meet the following requirements:
Straight Edge: I want a partner who follows a straight edge lifestyle. They don't have to identify with being straight edge as a label, but they must abstain from recreational drugs such as alcohol, tobacco, marijuana, psychedelics, etc. while intending to stay that way permanently. I have personal trauma with drug use in my family and even myself for a very brief period, so I don't wish to be with someone who doesn't have a principled rejection of drug use for themselves personally. I have no issue with coffee and prescriptions whatsoever, as the only reason why the sXe community ever tried to include such is a semantic concern. For instance, they might say something like "Well, they're by definition technically drugs, so we should abstain from them to be logically consistent!", but it's silly to me because straight edge subculture came out of hardcore punk fans wanting to reject excesses in the scene, and problems with those excesses sure as hell weren't from drinking coffee or taking medication.
Vegan: When I say vegan, I mean abolitionist-minded ethical vegan. This means no carnists, apologists, utilitarians, and people who are "doing it for health" or "doing it for the environment."
Radical Leftist (Preferably Marxist): Anyone who identifies with any of the following terms: anarchist (excluding ancaps, anprims, etc.), communist, radical leftist, revolutionary socialist, and of course, Marxist, likely meets this requirement. I'm not fond of considering social democrats or any kind of liberal, but I possibly might consider a democratic socialist that is an actual socialist and not just someone who uses it as a synonym for socdem.
Non-Religious (Preferably Anti-Theist): I am an anti-theist, but I open the door for people who are atheist (without simultaneously identifying as anti-theist), agnostic, and irreligious/unlabeled/something like ignostic or apatheist. The gray area consists of people who identify with religious terms like Christian, Muslim, or Hindu for maybe cultural reasons but are non-practicing. It's a gray area because I don't know how truly comfortable they'd be with my anti-theism. The red area consists of people who actively practice a religion and those who might be "SBNR" or a new age kind of person.
Childfree: Out of all of them, this is the most black and white. They have to not have any children, not desire any children in the future, and they must be completely settled on it. I have this one so strict because it's one that cannot be compromised on whatsoever. There basically is no middle ground between "wants kids" and "doesn't want kids." At that point, somebody would just have to comply with the other's wishes and roll with it if they are to stay together, and that doesn't sound pleasant at all.
I'd love a mask wearer too, but these are generally the 5 things I consider a part of my definitive list. I sound extremely picky, right? I know, and that's why I have a few additional considerations I've thought out.
Overlap: These things overlap in the order I listed them, i.e. straight edge people have a higher chance of being vegan, vegans have a higher chance of being radical leftists, radical leftists have a higher chance of being non-religious, and non-religious people have a higher chance of being childfree. You can't necessarily overlap all of them, though, in that you likely can't easily say "non-religious people overlap with straight edge people" for instance.
Comfort in Being Single: My last relationship gave me a shit ton of comfort in being single. I was so deeply in love with her, and that all got shattered into the ground simply because I couldn't reconcile our differences. Hell, some of our differences weren't as big as you might think, but it still was a deal breaker for me regardless. For example, even though she was vegan, she was a far more utilitarian type and an apologist, and that alone was something I felt highly uncomfortable with, let alone dating a carnist. I'd rather be single for the rest of my life than loosen my standards, full stop.
Casual Stuff: I might be open to more casual encounters that aren't intended to be long-term but more like a FWB kind of deal (volcel police, please stop monitoring me. Chill!) This person wouldn't be a candidate for marriage or anything like that, but I'd be totally fine doing these kinds of things with people who do not meet all of my strict requirements to the degree I desire. However, I'm not a fan of one-night scenarios; I'd like some kind of emotional connection with this person, and I'd establish these boundaries with this person as soon as we agree upon it.
Conversions: Some people I've told this about have asked me "Would you be open to dating someone who you could convince to change to meet your requirements?" I'm not comfortable with this for the most part because of a few reasons: A) It makes me feel like I'm "manipulating" or "forcing" things, and that sounds very off-putting and just not fun, B) I'd be concerned about the genuineness of some people changing, e.g. I wouldn't know if my partner would actually accept vegan ethics wholeheartedly and they might just see it as "appeasing" me, and C) It'd just be really damn hard in most instances. A lot of people are really hard to change, especially in the regards that I listed above.
I am strikingly weird—you don't have to tell me.
نحن شرطة VolCel.بناءا على تعليمات الهيئة لترويج لألعاب الفيديو و النهي عن الجنس نرجوا الإبتعاد عن أي أفكار جنسية و الحفاظ على حيواناتكم المنويَّة حتى يوم الحساب. اتقوا الله، إنك لا تراه لكنه يراك.
Ahh the magic of stated vs revealed preferences. It's why I don't take a lot of dating advice seriously, people, including myself, don't actually know what they want until they get it. To be honest I'd date a "lib" with their heart in the right place over a self righteous leftist 100 times out of 100.
Honestly comrade, you're super cool, and your requirements are very good. You deserve someone do can do the basic minimum. And honestly, so many people's requirements are bougie, and you have none of that.
2-3: Hell ya!
Not a massive big deal for me. Although I've dated a religious person and it can create problems, although this ex was religious and conservative.
Totally fair, and this is my thinking too