this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
1096 points (99.6% liked)

solarpunk memes

5725 readers
8 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Which of the recent chemical spills have been on federally owned rail?

[–] Liz@midwest.social 8 points 2 years ago

I hate it when Amtrak dumps hazardous waste everywhere!

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

None as far as I'm aware. The point is they make a profit so they have the same reason to avoid being regulated well enough.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

None as far as I'm aware

Wow, I guess that kind of makes that a totally irrelevant derailing of this post about chemical spills on railways.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The chemical spills are because of lack of regulation. Agreed?

That lack of regulation is because of for profit companies going as cheap as possible to make more money. Agreed?

The federal government owns a for profit passenger line that is comparatively large to other private passenger lines in the us. Agreed?

The federal government has a hand in regulating the same rails it has a stake in. Agreed?

So how exactly are these things not relevant in relation to chemical spills due to lack of regulation.... Like what?

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sorry, “the government runs some passenger lines so it’s the government’s fault that private companies on privately owned rail regularly create environmental disasters” doesn’t check out.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

With regulation being a federal issue yes. How is that a leap?

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

They’re federally mandated to run a profit. It’s actually a problem just not the one you think

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No that's exactly the problem I think it is. If they're mandated to turn a profit the federal government then has a perverse incentive to have weak regulation that allows greater profit margins.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No the problem as it manifests isn’t reduced regulation but basically zero service outside the northeastern corridor

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

As far as I'm aware both the recent large accidents were due to lack of maintenance due to lack of regulation spurred by greed and costing lives.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

As far as I’m aware the recent accidents weren’t Amtrak

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

You're being obtuse.