this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
1070 points (95.4% liked)

Memes

45874 readers
1097 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 18 points 5 months ago (4 children)

This conveniently ignores the progress being made with smaller and smaller models in the open source community.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

As with literally every technical progress, tech itself is no problem, capitalism usage of it is.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The problem is the concentration of power, Sam "regulate me daddy" Altman's plan is to get the government to create a web of regulation that makes it so only the big tech giants have access to the uncensored models.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

Of course, as usual with capitalism and basically everything, we had hope to recieve a tool making expressing themselves easy for workers lacking time and training to do art, and we will superexpensive proprietary software and monopolies quite possibly gatekeep by law. Again just as in software some hope is in open source.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Nowadays you can actually get a semi decent chat bot working on a n100 that consumes next to nothing even at full charge.

[–] oo1@lemmings.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I guess someone needs to tell google.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Someone needs to tell google that AI powered search is not working right now, and that they better wait a few years to try massively implementing that in a successful way.

Other AI fields are working really good. But search engine "instant AI answers" for general use are not in a phase when they should be as widely used as google (or microsoft) is trying to use them right now.

[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

In what sense does a small community working with open weight (note: rarely if ever open source) llm have any mitigating impact on the rampant carbon emissions for the sake of bullshit generators?

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not a small community by any means. It inherently is opposed to the unnecessarily large and wasteful models of corporations. But when people just lump i al l under "AI", the actually useful local models are the ones most likely to get harmed while Google, meta, and the other megacorps will be able to operate with impunity.

[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 0 points 5 months ago

Those people doing the majority of the lumping, and it's not even close, are the corporations themselves. The short hand exists. Machine learning is doing fine. Intentionally misinterpreting a message to incidentally defend the actions of the corporations doing the damage you are opposed to ain't it.

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It's almost all if Google chasing a quick buck is the issue.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

The big companies are racing to get the best model, and they're using highly inefficient GPUs to get there. Not just Google, Meta is doing it as well. They're also completely missing their "climate target" goals because of it

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 1 points 5 months ago

Crazy how corporations do that