181
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by Blaze@lemmy.zip to c/linux@programming.dev

Video announcement by Chris Wanstrath (GitHub co-founder) of the 501(c) non-profit and $1,000,000 donation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9edTqPMX_k

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rah@feddit.uk 9 points 5 days ago

Chris Wanstrath ... $1,000,000 donation

So.. not independent then.

[-] ipacialsection@startrek.website 31 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The website claims that sponsors have no direct influence on the project ("board seats are not for sale"). The reality is that no project of sufficient scale to fully implement web standards can survive without a significant amount of funding.

[-] venoft@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Meanwhile on their website:

Chris Wanstrath (Secretary & Treasurer)

[-] cerement@slrpnk.net 23 points 5 days ago

from the FAQ

  • How can you be "independent" if you have sponsors?
  • All sponsorships are in the form of unrestricted donations. Board seats and other forms of influence are not for sale.
[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 25 points 5 days ago

The threat of losing future donations if you upset a sponsor is still coercive.

[-] cerement@slrpnk.net 9 points 5 days ago

(sad part is even if they sold out, they’d still be leagues ahead of the compromises Firefox and Chrome have made)

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I do not understand how folks like you get so shitty about Firefox taking Google money for making it a default search engine when that is the very clear, very limited extent of their relationship. This is the definition of “don’t let perfect be the enemy of good.” Because Firefox is pretty damn near perfect. I feel like I have to be missing something here.

What is the issue here? What compromises have they made that make them so irredeemable? If it’s the search default for google that’s just not sufficient IMO.

[-] cerement@slrpnk.net 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)
[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)
  • I am pro deplatforming.

  • I need to look into the finances more before drawing a conclusion. Not a good look at face value though.

  • let’s see the suit play out, but also concerning

  • don’t know enough about anonym but acquiring an ad-focused company is hardly an indictment

  • they reversed course on the Russia issue so that’s not an issue and should make you feel better. Their reasoning was also legitimate, even so good on them for realizing it was the wrong - if well intentioned - decision.

  • everyone is exploring AI who gives a shit. They’ve hardly forced it down our throats like everyone else.

With all of this in mind i’m down to be critical but this is not enough to warrant the hate.

[-] cerement@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 days ago

“I’m not mad, I’m just … disappointed.”

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 5 days ago

Don’t be an asshole

this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
181 points (95.5% liked)

Linux

4382 readers
161 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS