135
submitted 3 months ago by Maven@lemmy.zip to c/usa@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] walden@sub.wetshaving.social -3 points 3 months ago

Call me silly, but isn't this sort of good? I think they're trying to say "you're immune if you do stuff that presidents do, like be in charge of war, torture, etc, but if you're a normal criminal, you're still a criminal".

[-] ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

If the president circumvents congress and declares war on another country, say Mexico, that would be an official act and they would be immune. They could fire nukes without repercussions.

[-] walden@sub.wetshaving.social 3 points 3 months ago

I really hate to quote Roberts, but circumventing congress wouldn't be "within his “conclusive and preclusive” constitutional authority", would it?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
135 points (99.3% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7146 readers
337 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS