1399
submitted 1 year ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] moriquende@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I disagree. Workers should be compensated for being at a specific location if and only if that physical presence is necessary to do their work. If that's the case, I think the commute and other costs should be carried by the employer. But if the employee is going to the office simply because they prefer to or enjoy it more, that adds zero value to the work they're doing compared to wfh employees and should not be compensated differently.

this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
1399 points (99.2% liked)

World News

31872 readers
511 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS