50
submitted 3 months ago by alex@jlai.lu to c/longreads@sh.itjust.works
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] De_Narm@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

I admit I only read about half of it, but I don't think the second half could convince me why anyone would ever think this concept works.

If you teach children to guess based on the pictures, they are not reading - that much should be obvious. I'm confused how they would even start to read anything without pictures. You cannot guess based on the context if you cannot read deep enough to establish one, even worse your context could be wrong.

However, the worst advice is to skip words. You're not learning new words if you skip anything you don't know already.

[-] walter_wiggles@lemmy.nz 15 points 3 months ago

The article only hints at this in the end, but there's a lot of money to be made in selling learning material to schools.

My opinion: While the origins of the "three cueing" method may have been well intentioned I'm guessing lobbying and kickbacks are what's keeping it in schools, not it's effectiveness.

[-] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 months ago

While the origins of the “three cueing” method may have been well intentioned I’m guessing lobbying and kickbacks are what’s keeping it in schools, not it’s effectiveness.

There is also the fact that the resistance to classic phonics in the USA developed as an anti-Bush stance during the 2000s. People thought they were taking a progressive stance against his family's conservative ideas about reading by adopting the cueing methods.

Turns out his family's passionate attack against cueing was actually completely justified even by the science of the time, let alone what we know now.

Bush is not a good guy but partisanship has ruined multiple generations of Americans' ability to read, and this cueing bullshit has been leaking into other countries too.

[-] Blaze@reddthat.com 2 points 3 months ago
[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Source that it was a result of anti-Bush? This was around way before him.

load more comments (5 replies)
this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
50 points (98.1% liked)

Excellent Reads

1473 readers
20 users here now

Are you tired of clickbait and the current state of journalism? This community is meant to remind you that excellent journalism still happens. While not sticking to a specific topic, the focus will be on high-quality articles and discussion around their topics.

Politics is allowed, but should not be the main focus of the community.

Submissions should be articles of medium length or longer. As in, it should take you 5 minutes or more to read it. Article series’ would also qualify.

Please either submit an archive link, or include it in your summary.

Rules:

  1. Common Sense. Civility, etc.
  2. Server rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS