278
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by Magnolia_@lemmy.ca to c/linux@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 65 points 2 days ago

If you have cutting edge hardware, this might be an issue. But most people don't and for them Mint will work just fine. If you want cutting edge, don't use Mint. But that's not their focus at all. Mint is for people who just want their computer to work with minimal hassle.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

If you have cutting edge hardware

If you have cutting edge hardware, you would probably need linux-next kernel. Otherwise you don't have cutting edge hardware.

[-] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 2 days ago

If you want cutting edge, don't use Mint. But that's not their focus at all. Mint is for people who just want their computer to work with minimal hassle.

These don't seem like competing needs. When I think "just work with minimal hassle", I don't think "I need to restrict myself to outdated hardware".

I'm perfectly happy running old packages in general. I'm still on Plasma 5, and it works just as well as it did last year. But that's a matter of features, not compatibility. Old is fine; broken is not.

[-] accideath@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

I think Mint is mostly for the "I have a PC that’s a few years old and want something easy and reliable to replace Windows with" crowd. Because it works great for that. It’s the perfect beginner distro.

[-] Liz@midwest.social 5 points 1 day ago

Yeah absolutely zero newbies are going to buy a new computer in order to test out Linux.

[-] vithigar@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 days ago

The machine I have running mint is a fifteen year old Core 2 Duo T6600 laptop. Works great!

[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I do want to add that new games can also require new packages, the way Alan Wake II did at launch. Even on Arch you had to compile the development version of Mesa for it to run.

[-] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

people who just want their computer to work with minimal hassle.

Elementary OS. Hassle-free, elegant and polished, distraction-free.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

I'd give it a shot if i was on the lookout for something new, but I see absolutely no reason to switch from Mint.

[-] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah there’s no need to change if you’re content with what you’re using.

[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

If you have cutting edge hardware, this might be an issue.

No, thanks to Valve's efforts for Steam Deck all RDNA2 hardware directly benefits for upstreamed improvements.

[-] furycd001@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 days ago

Any distro will "just work" if used correctly....

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

If you have to tiptoe around to use it "correctly", it doesn't "just work"

[-] furycd001@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

I never said anything about "tiptoeing around", but what you said here is correct....

[-] Magnolia_@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 days ago

The thing is that Linux has gone mainstream, with young adults and teens trying it out for Gaming and Streaming. The target people has changed so recommending Mint is not suitable anymore.

[-] HRDS_654@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago

I wouldn't quite go so far as to say it's gone "mainstream" since you still have to be moderately nerdy to know about it. I get your point though. This is one of the reasons I am so happy the Steam Deck exists. Before Valve released the Steam Deck nobody wanted to make games for Linux, so Valve said "fuck it, we'll do it ourselves" and proved it was not only possible, but a better experience overall. While not all games work, having 78-80% of your game library work on Linux, with no Windows OS performance tax, is a great experience. Even with the Proton compatibility layer games generally run faster than on Windows.

[-] Magnolia_@lemmy.ca -5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

this video from last month has 600k views. Ive seen several recent linux videos with 150k+ views. Brodie, Horn and the Linux Experience constantly pull 50k to 200K views on some of their videos.

You don't have to run linux to watch a video about linux.

[-] Magnolia_@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

It mean to say its not an obscure thing anymore, Id say its becoming mainstream.

[-] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Not even close to approaching mainstream!

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

It'a close. Isn't it at 4% market share? That's higher than Firefox.

this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
278 points (78.3% liked)

Linux

45443 readers
1244 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS