this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
633 points (98.6% liked)

World News

39023 readers
779 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 48 points 4 months ago (8 children)

He [Putin] also said that the fleet is being replenished with new ships, equipped with modern weapons, and that domestic shipbuilders will hand over more than 40 vessels to the Defense Ministry this year.

Sure, do that.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 27 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Is 40 a lot? That seems quite ambitious but I have no idea how long it takes to build one.

Edit: Russia's built ~16 of these Karakurt-class ships since 2018 lol. So no, it won't be 40 missle boats.

[–] Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Russia's built ~16 of these Karakurt-class ships since 2018 lol.

It's taken Russia over 10 years to just build a little over 10 stealth fighters. (And Ukraine has destroyed one)

Meanwhile the Netherlands alone has 24, and the U.S. has over 600.

Russia's high tech side of their military industrial complex is incredibly weak compared to the old USSR days, and even their low tech side is struggling.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Russia’s high tech side of their military industrial complex is incredibly weak compared to the old USSR days

They've been screwed since like the '60s because of the gap in microprocessor tech.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 4 months ago

Yeah, let's face it: the USSR collapsed for a reason, and its MIC was already failing by the time it did.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I can believe they're getting 40 vessels in the next year if they include literally everything they're getting. They certainly aren't getting 40 corvettes.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

It really depends on the kind of vessel though. China for instance has a ton of ships but less than tonnage than the US, and if you restrict that to ships that could realistically conduct long range opperations that tonnage is buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo even lower than the UK and Japan (not combined). So Russia could just be launching 40 new patrol boats next year, or maybe 2 actual ships and 38 patrol boats.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago

Depends. 40 RC sail boats? No, not very impressive. 40 supercarriers? Yes, very impressive.

At this point, I wouldn't put it past Russia to claim 40 RC sail boats as "new ships in the fleet".

[–] frezik@midwest.social 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No way they're replacing the bigger ones, like the Moskva. That one was built in a yard that's now in Ukraine, and Russia hasn't gotten that part back. Even if they did, Ukraine hadn't really maintained it.

It was also launched in 1979, and they haven't built anything that size since the USSR fell.

They'd have to rebuild the infrastructure needed to build the ship. These losses are irreplaceable.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

iirc they did build one for Admiral Kuznetsov. It also left that dry dock not that long ago so it's open now. They're having trouble funding anything larger than the Adm. Gorshkov class though. Which is about 50 meters shorter. So even if they did decide to throw down a 180M long guided missile cruiser they wouldn't be able to fund it. In fact they've been trying to get something called the Lidar class going and the Russian Navy is just like, "Nyet."

[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'd be willing to take a wild guess and say that at least 30+ of those new vessels are small support boats.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

We put Kalashnikov on Sergey's rowboat, Ukraine cowers before invincible Russian engineering!

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Well, they seem to be replenishing their submersible fleet in the Black Sea with lots of new under water vessels: for every ship they lose they get a new sub...

Yeah, except that per the Montreux Convention, because Turkey has recognized that Russia is “at war”, Russia is not allowed to transit any warships through the Bosporus Strait, so any new combat ship they make has to be made in the Black Sea.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Ships are expensive as hell and drones are comparatively cheap. Missiles too. Ships also take a month off Sundays to build in very obvious places because manufacturing lots of big stuff is pretty obvious to any intelligence analyst posting attention.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 1 points 4 months ago

Are they building them in the black sea?

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Good thing Putin is just as confused as whoever the next US President will be. Good thing these guys are in charge of the nukes.