1224
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Let's run through the recent story so people have it:

(First on FDR, that was before 45 years of anti-communist rhetoric, which frankly turned into anti-government-policy rhetoric.)

Jimmy Carter: Told people to conserve and got voted the fuck out.

Bill Clinton: After successive losses Bill figured out "it's the economy stupid". And when you run against an incumbent (Bush senior) you have to run from the center. So that's what he did. And he won.

Gore: After the population hopefully warmed up with Bill Clinton, he stuck his head out left with climate change. And bam he lost the election. Thanks 3rd party protest voters!

Obama: So guess what Obama learned? Don't stick your head out. He ran on broad "hope", hoping the ambiguity would be enough considering Bush's disastrous wars. And he won.

Hillary Clinton: After the population hopefully warmed up with Obama, she stuck her head out just a tiny itty little bit left with the Map Room to fight climate change. And guess what happened? Bam she lost. Thanks protest non-voters!

Biden: Just like Obama learned from Gore, Biden learned from Hillary that you don't stick your head out left. And he was running against an incumbent, so once again when you do that you run center. He's actually been governing more from the left, but he ran center. 

And people are amazed that they don't run an extreme left platform? Every time they stick their head out a little itsy bitsy tiny bit left they lose. And the next guy learns to go to the center to win.

So how do you get them to move left? By giving them victories. Consistent and overwhelming victories. Because when they lose, like they've lost 20 years out of the last 24 years, they will go to the centre to find votes. You don't get big steps without the small steps.

[-] Phegan@lemmy.world 81 points 2 weeks ago

Revisionist history. To pretend like Hillary went slightly left and Gore didn't have the election stolen from him is disingenuous at best.

[-] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 33 points 2 weeks ago

They claim Hillary lost because she went a little left and it is the fault of... left wing voters? Hmm.

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

I'm of the opinion that Hillary lost because of the blatant super delegate shenanigans within the DNC. I know I was LIVID. However, I wasn't one of the folks who were so livid that they protest voted third party. I held my nose, suppressed my gag reflex, and voted for Hillary, though I really didn't want to.

[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 3 points 2 weeks ago

We're seeing it now with leftists who refuse to vote for Biden. Thankfully Lemmy isn't really representative of the population. But they do exist.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 weeks ago

We are entering perhaps the most important election in history. I know that's said at every election but this time, this could very well be the last free election we have.

A vote against Biden, regardless of how it's done, is a vote for fascism. Plain and simple. It's no longer theoretical or fantasy. Or exaggeration or whatever the right is trying to paint this as.

Biden won in 2020 because it was a vote against Trump. Not because Biden was a good candidate. It just was not as terrible as Trump.

We are entering an election where Trump is promising to punish his enemies. This rhetoric is dangerous to our democracy and nation. The fact that we are debating this is by itself scary.

Trump WILL bring authoritarianism to our country. He will install himself as king and our country will be a democracy in name only. Hell it wouldn't surprise me if the fascist regime goes on to rename our country "The Democratic Republic of the ~~Gilliad~~ United States" just to keep up appearances.

Anyone who wants our country to be free must vote Biden in November. Is he contributing to genecide? Yes. Is he doing enough for climate change? Of course note. Is he tackling minimum wage? Nope.

But at least he's willing to listen to you. We might even be able to change his mind after he is in his second term.

You will get none of those things if Trump wins.

[-] fadingembers@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago

Honestly I think this is it. Do you think project 2025 goes away just because Trump does? It'll just be updated for 29 and as soon as the next Republican wins that's it, shows over. We can't keep pretending that winning this election will defeat them once and for all. It's just kicking the nuclear bomb down the road a bit. Eventually it will catch up and we will be living under a dictatorship anyways.

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub -2 points 2 weeks ago

This is a terrible point of view.

We can't keep pretending that winning this election will defeat them once and for all.

No one is pretending this. We keep authoritarianism and fascism at bay through constant vigilance. We defeat them by resisting and rejecting them at every turn.

The idea that we should just give up is asinine.

[-] fadingembers@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not saying to give up, I'm saying I want to see the Democrats do anything to protect us from a future Republican presidency other than hoping they'll be elected for the rest of time (which is an impossibility let's be real here)

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Hillary lost because she coasted through the end of her run. Everybody thought Trump wouldn't stand a chance. We had more faith in people.

That and conservative psyops getting Bernie Bros to abstain from holding their nose and voting Hillary because they felt like they were being wronged.

Hey wait a sec that last part is happening again today...

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Through the end? Most of her campaign was coasting by on solid blue areas and ignoring whole parts of the country.

So many people were surprised by her loss in 2016, but I saw it coming months away. The fact that her campaign pushed trump as a pied piper candidate and gave him credibility because they thought she could easily beat him is just the icing on the turd cake.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

left wing voters? Hmm.

No, the left wing non-voters, that didn't vote in protest.

[-] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

That had nothing to do with that election or any election

There was actual fraud at play, stop blaming people fed up with this bullshit

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe you reply replied to the wrong message, because the left wing protest non-voters have to do with every single election.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (108 replies)
this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
1224 points (97.4% liked)

Political Memes

4617 readers
2831 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS