675
submitted 5 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

Charismatic + Young + Intelligent + Christofascist...

0 results found.

I think Republicans might need to remove one search criterion to make that work.

As for Dems... that might just be AOC? Lol

[-] Leviathan@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

You're right. DeSantis would've been catastrophic if he wasn't such a little weirdo with no charisma.

[-] absentbird@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago

I would love to vote for AOC. She will be old enough to run next year, but it will be four years before the next election.

[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

She checks all the boxes unless you're the type to believe Republican spin (she was a bartender once but has more education than most GoP house members). I'm unfortunately sure she'll get the same DNC treatment as Sanders, though :/

[-] absentbird@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago

I don't think the DNC will be able to stop her. They can only do so much. I was a huge Bernie fan, volunteered at rallies and everything, but even I can acknowledge that the support was not quite strong enough to overcome the establishment headwind. He came close twice, but I think there were a number of people who wrote him off over his age and whatnot.

I think AOC could tip the scales, she's young and smart and has real conviction. She has all the Bernie benefits with none of the baggage.

[-] Hellinabucket@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Honestly I think aoc is the only I could be excited to vote for right now.

[-] Leviathan@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

That spin is hilarious when you consider the source, they voted for a reality TV personality and didn't bar an eye when he padded his cabinet with family members and inept grifters.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

I'm unfortunately sure she'll get the same DNC treatment as Sanders, though :/

What, other than bleak cynicism, leads you to that conclusion?

[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Why, bleak cynicism of course!

No really, it's just my concern since she's on the progressive side and you know how the Dems are.

[-] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

History, history leads to that conclusion

[-] Burstar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 months ago

Not an American, but AOC is who I hope the Dems go with next time. She's the only thing I envy about your political situation atm.

[-] Resonosity@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

I'd love to vote for AOC too

[-] TheBraveSirRobbin@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

I mean there's definitely intelligent enough people who just want to use people

[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Of course! But I don't think there's any public figure Republicans who fit the bill.

[-] TheBraveSirRobbin@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

You don't think there's people out there to chirp the republican agenda for their own personal gain? People are definitely smart enough to say things they don't believe in to manipulate others

[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Who's both charismatic, young, and intelligent? Don't get me wrong, I'm quite aware people lie to manipulate others (that's like all religions) but I don't think there's someone in the GOP, or are GOP aligned celebs, who fit the description. Like... who? The best they ran celeb-wise Dr. Oz and he's am uncharismatic weasel.

Maybe two of the three, but even that's a stretch (DeSantis for instance might be two of three but I have doubts he's particularly intelligent; maybe by GOP standards). I guess someone could emerge but whoever they are, they ain't on my radar.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I don't think you'll be happy with the one Republicans choose to get rid of.

this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
675 points (94.5% liked)

News

23322 readers
3835 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS