this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
272 points (97.9% liked)

News

36891 readers
2479 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] solrize@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (4 children)

In a way that is less terrifying than a smaller imbalance could be. Like if your neighbor is a cop or maybe a municipal judge in your town, they can really mess with you. But a SCOTUS justice--what are they going to do? Grant emergency cert to your opponent from some Internet debate? Good luck with that, Alito. I'm just me but it doesn't sound like much to worry about.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 37 points 2 years ago

If it was me, I'd be worried that Alito would use his contacts/indirect power. You don't get on SCOTUS without a TON of networking. Side benefit: plausible deniability since it isn't direct retaliation.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 31 points 2 years ago

Uh...what ? They have connections to every law enforcement officer around you, every prosecutor, every everything.

One phone call and lots of higher ups will be happy to handle a "favor" for a supreme court judge.

[–] fpslem@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

I thought the allegations were that the Alitos were using the extra security officers given to them as part of the intimidation. Armed officers are always a danger.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Hard disagree.

Alito can call the agency responsible for protecting them (Supreme court police? Marshals?) and say you threatened him.

Who’re they really going to believe? Richness whitendude who sits on the top court or random newly weds?

That’s like swatting on steroids and they’ll just pass it off as a mere misunderstanding