0
()
submitted a long while ago by @ to c/@
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] davel@lemmy.ml 22 points 3 months ago

Fredrich Engels, 1872: On authority

Have these gentlemen ever seen a revolution? A revolution is certainly the most authoritarian thing there is. It is the act by which one part of the population imposes its will on the other part by means of rifles, bayonets and cannons — by the most authoritarian means possible; and the victors, if they do not want to have fought in vain, must maintain this rule by means of the terror which their arms inspire in the reactionaries. Would the Paris Commune have lasted a single day if the communards had not used the authority of the armed people against the bourgeoisie? Should we not, on the contrary, reproach them for not having used it enough?

Therefore, we must conclude one of two things: either the anti-authoritarians don’t know what they’re talking about, in which case they are only sowing confusion; or they do know, in which case they are betraying the proletarian movement. In either case, they serve reaction.

[-] friendly_ghost@beehaw.org 19 points 3 months ago

Found the tankie! ☝️

[-] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de -3 points 3 months ago

How about, I don't know, establishing some sort of democracy? Just a crazy idea

[-] Redderthanmisty@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 3 months ago

Oh, but they did.

It just doesn't resemble the bourgeois 'democracy' we have in the west, but rather something else entirely that better fits the 'for the people, by the people, of the people" definition of democracy.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 months ago

Maybe capitalist states should do that, but they won’t because they’re capitalist states. They’ll form bourgeois democracies at best and fascism at worst[1][2][3].

[-] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 months ago

You misunderstood me. I'm saying after the revolution. The Engels quote implies that because revolution is authoritarian, so is whatever system it implements. Which I disagree with

[-] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 months ago

What your genius idea is missing is that there is an already established society with a ruling class, is your plan to ask nicely? 😅

The point Engels is making is that revolution is about establishing one group authority over the already established authority. In a society where might makes right, only might can resolve it.

this post was submitted on 01 Jan 0001
0 points (NaN% liked)

0 readers
0 users here now

founded a long while ago