this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
1030 points (89.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

9842 readers
2276 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nulluser@programming.dev 317 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Please don't perpetuate this myth. He was tried, and found guilty, for falsifying business records to cover up payments that he made for purposes that many of his voters would find objectionable in order to hide that objectionable information from those voters to prevent them from making an informed decision and affecting an election.

[–] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 94 points 2 years ago

Election interference and Fraud.

He is a literal, convicted, fraud.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 44 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's really no different than saying Clinton got impeached for a blowjob.

He wasn't, it was perjury. Though I'd say that election interference is a bit more severe than lying about a beej.

[–] draneceusrex@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

No, both damaged institutions are fundamental to our government. Fuck them both.

[–] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 31 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Bush Jr should have been convicted for mass murder. Obama should have been convicted for drone strikes.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 44 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I’m not disagreeing with you, but at least those awful actions are plausibly covered as a presidential act made in the country’s interests. I’m not saying they were good for the US, just that they could argue that was the process.

Trump’s shit is all self-serving and against the interests of the United States.

[–] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

presidential act made in the country’s interests.

If your country's interests require committing mass murder (like Bush Jr or Obama did), then your country is an awful evil place.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 6 points 2 years ago

I cannot disagree with you there!

That’s mostly what I meant by this sentence:

I’m not saying they were good for the US, just that they could argue that was the process.

Even if they make the worst, most destructive decisions that most of their constituents disagree with, it’s still a presidential act. I assume they can’t be charged in the US. Might be different in an international court, but I think we refuse to recognize their authority or something, because U-S-A! U-S-A!

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Trump increased drone strikes 432%, so same there.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

All ex American presidents in jail for war crimes?

Don't threaten us with a good time

[–] absentbird@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I agree, but apparently presidents are immune from prosecution for anything done in office. I really hope that can get overturned, but it's the current state of the law.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Yeah, we know. That has no bearing on this case.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Trump and Clinton raped women. Probably not the only presidents.

Edit: I'm not talking about Lewinsky. See my comment below.

[–] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Rape is bad. Mass murder is much worse.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Starving teens of millions is OK though.

[–] fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Linkerbaan is a shill. Look at their posts. The terrorists in the Kremlin pay them to get Trump elected.

[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago

I don't think they're a shill: they're probably just an idiot.

[–] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 years ago

Only a terminally online liberal could look at someone criticizing a justice system that serves the rich rather than the protection of basic human rights (especifically saying that Trump has worse things to get convicted for) and think: "Hmm, yes, this is a Russian shill, lest I even take into consideration that they might actually have a good point".

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's a very long way of saying "Hush money to a porn star".

Its not even as though Trump didn't commit additional financial crimes while in office. He took money from the Saudis for state secrets. He traded insider information to his son-in-law for fundraising money. He staffed his departments with hedge fund insiders as a quid pro quo for personal financial favors. And that's before we get to the illegal use of military force or the illegal direction of federal money for his pet border projects or the illegal arrest and unconstitutional prosecution of migrants and dissidents or the J6 shit.

91 fucking indictments. One trial. For the hooker hush money.

Say what you will about kickbacks to Stormy Daniels, but its the least lethal policy on the Trump docket. And that's a real window into the soul of America. Rounding up and incarcerating people without trial is fine. Bombing foreigners is fine. Marching a high-on-their-own-supply fascist mob through Congress is fine. Just don't get caught slipping your mistress a tenner to keep her mouth shut during an election season.