2726
submitted 1 month ago by TheDudeV2@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 68 points 1 month ago

This needs to be brought up every damned time this subject comes up. Cohen served time for the exact same crime - so what argument is there that Trump shouldn't?

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 22 points 1 month ago

so what argument is there that Trump shouldn't?

The American justice system has been successfully boiled down to a pay to play system and it's unfair to not let other rich people go for more serious crimes, but not Trump .

I mean I don't think they would be honest enough to run with that, but it's the only argument I can think of that would be based on an unfortunate truth.

Everyone consciously or subconsciously knows the justice system works differently for different classes. The only reason anyone who leans right actually believes it could be a "witch hunt" is because no one has an iota of faith in the justice system. Sending a "billionaire" to jail is so rare that the possibility of it happening seems suspicious.

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I completely agree. I asked what argument there was that he shouldn't, not that he wouldn't.

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

It takes a lot of balls to send a former and possibly future president to prison. Way more balls than sending his lackay.

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

Paraphrasing, "We choose to send Trump to prison, not because it is easy, but because it is hard."

[-] logi@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I choose to send Trump to prison, not because I'm easy, but because I'm hard.

[-] Chekhovs_Gun@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Something something Trumps a jelly donut

[-] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Cohen didn't need a secret service detail.

The Guardian are reporting it is unlikely he will see jail time

Edit: it's not a disagree button, it's being widely reported he is unlikely to see jail time. that doesn't mean i think he shouldn't see jail time

[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 month ago

Everyone is reporting he won't see jail time, which in my view is giving the court a pass on giving him a light sentence.

In my opinion, Trump gained so much, and could gain so much from a repeat offense, that jail is the only compelling punishment for him. He is unrepentant, and would do it again in a heartbeat.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

You are correct, but nevertheless, a court so cowardly they cannot hold him accountable for blatant violations of court orders will not jail him either.

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

He could never go to a traditional jail, not with the amount of classified information he was exposed to.

He would need a separate area of Leavenworth with no interaction with other humans except the guard and secret service detail unfortunately assigned to him.

Then he has hell to look forward to.

[-] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

Pretty sure the secret service would be the guards, I doubt "regular" confinement officers would be trusted in that situation.

They'd have to either train a special detail, or get applicants from current CO's to join the secret service.

this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
2726 points (99.3% liked)

News

21734 readers
3610 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS