1345
submitted 6 months ago by fukhueson@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ledivin@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Looking at how many people actually vote for 3rd parties puts into perspective how many people actually want to solve this issue.

...effectively no-one, as far as country-wide population statistics are concerned? What percentage of the vote went third-party in the last three elections? Gary Johnson (8 years ago) got a whole 3%, and that was massive compared to anyone in the past 30 years... basically unprecedented. Those numbers barely broke 1% last time.

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

Yes. That's my point. A ridiculously minuscule amount of people actually want to reduce the disparity in wealth.

Support for 3rd parties exemplifies that.

[-] Ledivin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I'm sorry, but no, it doesn't. Most people are just living in a reality where voting third-party gets the worst option elected, because that's historically its only effect.

Look, I'm not gonna fight you, it's clear that your mind is made up. Just think about the probability of your choices, and think about how much you appreciate the ability to even vote... because that's the actual argument, here. Trump has laid out his plans, and you're welcome to ignore them, but most people don't have that luxury, they need to vote in ways that don't have a chance to lead to their culling.

[-] john89@lemmy.ca -1 points 6 months ago

because that’s historically its only effect.

Yeah, that's my entire point. 3rd parties don't win because they actually support policies that reduce the disparity in wealth.

These problems do not get solved because we don't want to solve them.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com -4 points 6 months ago

You're making false assumptions about what people's voting habits say about what they want, drawing absurd conclusions as a result, and then doubling down on your false assumptions even when real people tell you what they want why they vote the way they do. Here's a clue for you: other people know their own beliefs and motivations a hell of a lot better than you do. It's supremely arrogant for you to think otherwise.

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

Here’s a clue for you: other people know their own beliefs and motivations a hell of a lot better than you do.

I wish you could say that to most of the people replying to me assuming I'm a trump supporter, lol.

[-] Ledivin@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

You might not be a Trump supporter, but your actions support Trump. That's not really debatable.

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

Right. I'm either with you, or against you.

[-] Ledivin@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

Literally yes, in the voting system that the US has. This isn't some ideological hill I'm dying on, this is basic statistics and understanding of elections.

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago
[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com -3 points 6 months ago

Have you tried acting less like one?

[-] john89@lemmy.ca -1 points 6 months ago

Tribalists can, and will, believe whatever they want.

It would be foolish of me to change myself to please them.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com -4 points 6 months ago

Your lack of self awareness is truly a sight to behold.

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago
this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
1345 points (97.9% liked)

News

23260 readers
4166 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS