180
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 10 points 6 months ago

Per the actual rule:

As discussed in section II.B.3, DOE is finalizing standards for all consumer water heaters, with the exception of gas-fired instantaneous water heaters, in this Final Rule.

So there has been no change to the rules for tankless heaters.

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 4 points 6 months ago

Believe It or not there are electrical tankless heaters. I actually installed one not too long ago because it made sense in a very odd application.

Mostly they're a terrible idea though.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 4 points 6 months ago

Yeah, they're pretty rare and almost never the best option. I don't think I've actually encountered one.

[-] sudo42@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

We’ve considered switching to an electric tankless WH. What makes them a poor choice?

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 4 points 6 months ago

Extreme energy use for pretty low deltas on temperature. Best possible efficiency is 100%, far less than the 2.5+ cop a heat pump unit will get you. If it's at all manageable, get the heat pump.

Frankly, their inefficiency means the emissions they cause are still pretty bad unless you know your energy source is more renewable than most.

But they don't need venting, which is nice. They do take a big fat electrical connection though - the one I installed was two 2 pole 40a breakers - hopefully you have at least 200A service. Mostly they work as intended.

[-] sudo42@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Thanks. That makes sense. We installed a gas tankless after looking into electric tankless. The lack of venting looked really attractive until I blanched at the wiring we'd need to pull. My experience with tanked electrics was that they take a long time to recover. Is this also true of heat-pump based tanked WHs?

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Most of them are actually coal fired.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Is that because they were already efficient or because they can't reasonably be made more sense efficient?

[-] Cort@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I would assume both. They transfer basically all the heat generated into the water and only heat when water is being used.

this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
180 points (98.4% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5198 readers
621 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS